new reply email notification 1
 

For those who subscribe to certain threads, I will be interesting to know that I've done a small modification to include the message that is posted in the email (much like you get with vB3)

that way you immediately see the message that is posted


here's an example I tried:




Hello jmke,

test has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Piotr is blogging - in the Off-Topic Hangout forum of Forum Madness @ Madshrimps.

~~~~~~~~~~~~ message posted ~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Q1 of 2006, AMD-based systems accounted for over $1 billion, or one sixth of the x86 server space. The Opteron grew from a 6% market share to 15% market share in the astonishingly short period of only one year. In four socket servers, the Opteron grabbed 48% of the US market, up from 23% last year. What's more, this is not a "US only" phenomenon: the Opteron has a firm grip on 36% of the worldwide four socket market. Bear in mind that less than 4 years ago, AMD was nothing more than a blip on the server CPU radar.

Sun, which was getting strangled by the high volume Intel Xeon and the mighty Itanium, has also made a big comeback. An attractive UltraSparc IV+ with a fast, integrated L2 cache and massive L3 cache keeps the traditional Sparc buyers loyal, while the well-designed Galaxy Opteron based servers are pretty popular and the UltraSparc T1 "throughput CPU" attacks the midrange x86 market.

It's high time for Intel to find a proper response, as the competition is taking the wind out of Intel's server CPU sails. What's the answer? A Xeon based on the Core architecture: Woodcrest. We compared the Core and K8 architectures just a month ago. Memory disambiguation, large OOO buffers and a large but low latency shared L2 cache should make the Core architecture more efficient in server related tasks than any other x86 CPU.

This article compares a Woodcrest based Intel server with its closest rivals: AMD Opteron based servers such as the HP DL385 and MSI K2-102A2M and the UltraSparc T1 based Sun T2000 server.
~~~~~~~~~~~~ end of message ~~~~~~~~~~~~

To view the thread visit: http://www.madshrimps.be/forums/show...6&goto=newpost

Very good !

Like it.

it's wasn't that hard either;) I've also (again?) removed all [Acronym=yellow]redirect pages[/Acronym], so no intermediate "post edited, thread post, reply posted" messages and after a new reply you are now correctly forwarded to your post

[box=yellow]a yellow box with text[/box]


[box=blue]a blue box with text[/box]

title
 

this is only a test -- yes

Quick-Edit added, no need to reload the thread, you just click the small radio button and you are good to go! :)


working nicely :)

Really

now use a resolution which is not from the stone ages :)

really

laptop only supports 1024 :(

so forum looks wierd too :) previous was better.

most used feature is webnew forum & "new posts" link; main forum page is not as used as you might think:)

it's not perfect, not claiming it to be either; it's a WIP as usual, but working nonetheless:)

will try to make the quick-edit and news menu a selectable item in the user profile so you can enable/disable it, will have to do some research to see how this is done though;)

I do not thing the new forum look looks weird :D

But you are right JMKe, i only use the "New Post" button.

edit: resize

you are using wide-screen:) 1900 pixels wide, enough room to play, I have to make sure the forum & site is fully functional at 1024 width, the majority of users still use that resolution

@piotke: I have changed the lenght of the news posts and reduced the column size, I'm testing it now in IE at 1024 at it looks okay, let me know what you think

hmmm, hitting refresh on the forum index gives you different results... same as in the past in fact, it's just more visible now, take a look here, in IE just F5'ing the forum gives you this

!!

Under "Thread View Options" you can now select Yes/No for the newposts on the main forum view


http://www.madshrimps.be/forums/memb...on=editoptions

:super: much better now :D

Thx :ws: