New Hosting: Quicker ? - Page 2

19th August 2002, 07:20

Quote:

Originally posted by Erwin
Personally I pretty much like www.boxke.be - their server is really blazing fast, even for heavy php+mySQL stuff. Prices are CHEAP. But!! They're down from time to time, and they happen to have a pretty amateuristic management...

my friends' site was down for 3 (three!!!) weeks
boxke sucks big time
they didn't even have decent back-ups

20th August 2002, 15:37

Stevos, it's true boxke had had severe problems in the past. Their shellserver and webserver were on the same machine, and as you all know, shellservers get DDOS'ed quite often.

That downtime was when they moved their webserver to a new, faster machine... I'm hosting there since March I think, and it's been down about one day all together since then.

The fact they didn't have decent backups, that's what I mean by lack of professional management. But I always backup my own stuff about once a week...

However, I still wouldn't host a real important site on boxke... (BTW - I have nothing to do with boxke... I'm just telling what I know

)

By the way: I heard bad things about BASM... The owner once used the mailinglist of one of his biggest clients for an own spammailing - See http://users.pandora.be/basm/

jmke · 20th August 2002, 16:52

BASM hosting is for 95% very quick
once in a while a hick-up but never full downtime

their support is lighting fast, have no complaints

biCker · 20th August 2002, 17:48

weird, same problem again and only with this forum: lot of time-out's??? Doen't basm like adsl anymore?

20th August 2002, 18:38

Well, it took me 2 minutes before this page started loading... Normally, it takes about 10 - 15 secs before it starts, and then it loads in 3 - 4 secs... I'm on telenet.

20th August 2002, 21:48

We're quite happy of 3TS, more thn we were about Basm, over @ born2program...So if you're considering a new host, take a look at 3TS

jmke · 20th August 2002, 22:10

not planning on changing any time soon, I've paid my share, I want speedy forum & site!

20th August 2002, 22:32

Well I must say I also have some speed probs just like erwin. It takes at least 30 secs to open a page with 2 users online.

Also have telenet (could be that to).

21st August 2002, 07:20

I had the same yesterday evening, but it's all right now

21st August 2002, 09:45

here's everything also back to normal.

View Poll Results: Lanparty?
YES	14	100.00%
NO	0	0%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

20th August 2002, 16:52	#13
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	BASM hosting is for 95% very quick once in a while a hick-up but never full downtime their support is lighting fast, have no complaints __________________

20th August 2002, 22:10	#17
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	not planning on changing any time soon, I've paid my share, I want speedy forum & site! __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Quicker Athlon II X4 coming this quarter	jmke	WebNews	0	7th July 2010 14:22
New, quicker Radeon HD 5670 in the works	jmke	WebNews	0	17th May 2010 19:59
Spam increasing again after shutdown of hosting company	Shogun	WebNews	0	27th November 2008 03:34
Video gamers may have quicker eyes	Sidney	WebNews	7	3rd July 2005 17:02
Windows Hosting versus Linux Hosting	Sidney	WebNews	3	14th June 2005 22:31
Beginner’s guide to web site hosting	Sidney	WebNews	0	12th May 2005 17:35
Website Hosting From A Home PC	Sidney	WebNews	1	20th April 2005 21:53
Hosting	koensa	Mad Bargains	9	7th February 2005 11:29
New Hosting III : Quicker ?	jmke	Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home	24	30th December 2002 01:06

20th August 2002, 15:37	#12
Erwin Posts: n/a	Stevos, it's true boxke had had severe problems in the past. Their shellserver and webserver were on the same machine, and as you all know, shellservers get DDOS'ed quite often. That downtime was when they moved their webserver to a new, faster machine... I'm hosting there since March I think, and it's been down about one day all together since then. The fact they didn't have decent backups, that's what I mean by lack of professional management. But I always backup my own stuff about once a week... However, I still wouldn't host a real important site on boxke... (BTW - I have nothing to do with boxke... I'm just telling what I know ) By the way: I heard bad things about BASM... The owner once used the mailinglist of one of his biggest clients for an own spammailing - See http://users.pandora.be/basm/

20th August 2002, 17:48	#14
biCker [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,186	weird, same problem again and only with this forum: lot of time-out's??? Doen't basm like adsl anymore?

20th August 2002, 18:38	#15
Erwin Posts: n/a	Well, it took me 2 minutes before this page started loading... Normally, it takes about 10 - 15 secs before it starts, and then it loads in 3 - 4 secs... I'm on telenet.

20th August 2002, 21:48	#16
fredperry Posts: n/a	We're quite happy of 3TS, more thn we were about Basm, over @ born2program...So if you're considering a new host, take a look at 3TS

20th August 2002, 22:32	#18
PlayboY Posts: n/a	Well I must say I also have some speed probs just like erwin. It takes at least 30 secs to open a page with 2 users online. Also have telenet (could be that to).

21st August 2002, 07:20	#19
TeuS Posts: n/a	I had the same yesterday evening, but it's all right now

21st August 2002, 09:45	#20
PlayboY Posts: n/a	here's everything also back to normal.