 |  |  |  |  |
***** WU
| |||||||||
|
***** WU
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
16th June 2004, 11:30
| #21 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,600
 |  Protein: p1090_RN24_extended nooooooooooooo  100 frames/ @ 13 minutes 2 minutes less with -forceSSE |
|
|
18th June 2004, 23:42
| #22 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,419
 | 239 WU's are being folded now, approx 31 hours away from submitting 4 of those WU's.. which is pretty lousy, seeing as I can submit more then 400 points in gromacs in 1 day.. blah.
__________________  |
|
|
|
20th June 2004, 12:09
| #23 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,419
| tinkers have left the building  back to folding speedy Gromacs cores 
__________________ |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 10:39
| #24 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,600
| [08:35:48] Assembly optimizations on if available. [08:35:48] Entering M.D. [08:35:54] Protein: p212_villinURE212 [08:35:54] [08:35:54] Writing local files [08:35:59] Extra SSE boost OK. [08:35:59] Writing local files [08:35:59] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0) [08:51:58] Writing local files [08:51:58] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1) [09:07:56] Writing local files [09:07:56] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2) [09:24:04] Writing local files [09:24:04] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3) and this is a gromac :grum: 16 minutes/frame  |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 11:05
| #25 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,419
| yep, sweet spot for Gromacs seem to be between 68-78 pointers  78 WU, 100 steps, 4min/frame
__________________ |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 11:17
| #26 | |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,600
| Quote:
this WU will take very long before it's finished. But there seems to be something wrong. My last frame was 7 minutes instead of 17 minutes. there is still hope  | |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 18:49
| #27 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,419
| time per frame seems to flucuate a lot for these Gromacs apparantly [13:29:15] Completed 435000 out of 500000 steps (87) [13:53:44] Writing local files [13:53:44] Completed 440000 out of 500000 steps (88) [14:18:18] Writing local files [14:18:18] Completed 445000 out of 500000 steps (89) [14:42:47] Writing local files [14:42:47] Completed 450000 out of 500000 steps (90) [15:07:18] Writing local files [15:07:18] Completed 455000 out of 500000 steps (91) [15:31:57] Writing local files [15:31:57] Completed 460000 out of 500000 steps (92) [15:56:31] Writing local files [15:56:31] Completed 465000 out of 500000 steps (93) [16:21:06] Writing local files [16:21:06] Completed 470000 out of 500000 steps (94) [16:45:31] Writing local files [16:45:32] Completed 475000 out of 500000 steps (95) [17:10:04] Writing local files [17:10:04] Completed 480000 out of 500000 steps (96) [17:34:34] Writing local files
__________________ |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 19:28
| #28 | |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,600
| Quote:
| |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 19:35
| #29 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,419
| my point proven
__________________ |
|
|
|
2nd July 2004, 19:40
| #30 | |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,600
| Quote:
| |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Standard thermal paste is a bitch | Pistons | Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs | 7 | 10th October 2005 21:08 |
| Mini disks... what a bitch. | Infamous | Off-Topic Hangout | 3 | 7th July 2004 21:09 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
