 |  |  |  |  |
Raystorm benchmarks
| |||||||||
|
Raystorm benchmarks
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
12th August 2002, 10:23
| #1 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
 |  Raystorm benchmarks Tired of those 3D Mark screens ? Maybe you should try the Raystorm Benchmark. You need a crafty setup though. Just ran it on a XP1600, 512RAM and GeForce GTS Pro ... the images are very nice but not smooth at all. Hehe, be quick and take your chance to be N°1 ... for a couple of days. http://www.realtimeraytrace.de/Download.html |
|
|
12th August 2002, 10:44
| #2 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| will do
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
12th August 2002, 19:14
| #3 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,587
| Is't that a software benchmark, only high powerd cpu's get a high score (read that on Tweakers  )
__________________  |
|
|
|
12th August 2002, 19:34
| #4 |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| Indeed, it's independend from your graphics card. My score (untweaked XP1700+ i think): 4011
__________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini | Core Duo 1.6Ghz | 2GB DDR2 | 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook | Core 2 2.0Ghz | 4GB DDR2 | 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz | HD3850 OC | Asrock 4coredual-vsta | 2GB DDR2 |
|
|
|
12th August 2002, 23:40
| #5 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
 | 1024x576x32 Shadows+Reflections 2979
__________________  |
|
|
|
13th August 2002, 08:21
| #6 |
| [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,344
| Umpfh? Another benchmarking in favor of AMD (cfr. SuperPi)? ??? |
|
|
|
13th August 2002, 10:14
| #7 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| at what resolution did you run it?
__________________ |
|
|
|
13th August 2002, 10:58
| #8 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| when I know what resolution you run it @ I'll try and give it a shot @3.2
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
13th August 2002, 11:12
| #9 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| Quote:
mental note: buy new glasses 4 the doc 
__________________ | |
|
|
|
13th August 2002, 11:32
| #10 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| grmbl. nocturnal telefonesex with under-age-purty-gurls is not good for your eyesight or whatever 
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| No Official Fermi Benchmarks Numbers To Be Expect At Cebit | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd March 2010 12:40 |
| More NVIDIA GF100 Benchmarks: Far Cry 2 & Dark Void | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th January 2010 09:28 |
| NVIDIA "Fermi" Benchmarks Leaked? GeForce GTX 360 and 380 Performance Numbers [fake] | jmke | WebNews | 9 | 14th December 2009 20:30 |
| First AMD Benchmarks With DDR3 Memory Spotted | jmke | WebNews | 4 | 25th January 2009 15:39 |
| Quick and Dirty Quad-Core "Penryn" Benchmarks | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 24th August 2007 09:05 |
| NVIDIA & ATI GTK Benchmarks | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 31st July 2007 00:23 |
| AMD Launches AM2 - Benchmarks Numbers from all over the web | jmke | WebNews | 12 | 23rd May 2006 20:57 |
| Futuremark’s Benchmarks to Take Advantage of Physics Processor | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th October 2005 16:18 |
| ATI Response to Doom 3 Benchmarks | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th July 2004 07:13 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
