Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/)
-   -   7300GT Overclocking Contest - Ranking/Rules (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f10/7300gt-overclocking-contest-ranking-rules-34156/)

Gamer 27th August 2007 19:08

Nice result, must bench more, more I tell you........

geoffrey 27th August 2007 19:13

Time for Steven pokerface to show us what he really has done with his sample. In meantime, I'm close to 240FPS, very close :D

EDIT: took first spot in 3D Mark 2003
89,3 FPS - 900/1050 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5496710

Pardons 27th August 2007 19:29

Your results are kinda remarkable since your temps are way higher at lower clocks compared to mine, yet you managed to make a run at those clocks with such temps and stay stable....Blind couldn't do it at 890 without getting frame drops.
Nice one i would say :)
I sold my cards (2 pieces) therefor no backups to show, although i have some runs at a other disk at 925/1135mhz...2.1V/2.45V :D

geoffrey 27th August 2007 19:39

Last time I checked I had around 60°C on load, that's with + 1,8V on the GPU and near 900MHz clock. Check my thread, Cranox give me a tip to get better temps :)

925MHz, insane, is that still aircooled?

Pardons 27th August 2007 19:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by geoffrey (Post 153821)
Last time I checked I had around 60°C on load, that's with + 1,8V on the GPU and near 900MHz clock. Check my thread, Cranox give me a tip to get better temps :)

925MHz, insane, is that still aircooled?

That's aircooled yes, at 925 i'm at only 49° stressed, 880 45°c, yet at those speeds it shows slowdowns frame drops, that's why your results is pretty neat :) I had to rerun it rerun and keep going untill i had 1 stable run...wich resulted in 251fps...

Anyways keep pushing although i don't think anyone wil give some head to you :p
I sold my cards long time ago so technicaly i was already a month out of the compo :)

Btw teh card coulkd take 2.13V before it would give me blankscreen...2.1V was benchable :D

jmke 27th August 2007 20:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pardons (Post 153822)
Anyways keep pushing although i don't think anyone wil give some head to you :p

excuse me?

Gamer 27th August 2007 20:35

Jmke is frustrated, or Pardons is :)

geoffrey 27th August 2007 20:37

241,3 - 905/1055 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9248747

That's it for now, for higher scores I need a better heatsink.

jmke 27th August 2007 20:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gamer (Post 153824)
Jmke is frustrated, or Pardons is :)

I point out a wrong translation... are you frustrated gamer? |D

Cranox 27th August 2007 22:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by geoffrey (Post 153825)
241,3 - 905/1055 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9248747

That's it for now, for higher scores I need a better heatsink.

Nice corespeed geoffrey , dont think that anybody got much higher on air ( there go's my plan for the nr1 spot ... )
Im gonna test the copperblock for fun then ( i can not gain 60 mhz on core with that blok :( )

This is my score 231,6 fps http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9224885
855core 1.76v
1010 ram 2.21v


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO