![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Wel since I have some time left before holiday in a few days. Lets start with the basics ![]() final benching Config: TBD: ![]() MOBO: Asus P5W DH (sold tomorrow) CPU: E6600 (sold tomorrow) MEM: Corsair Twinx2 Pro 6400C4 (sold tomorrow) MEM: 4 x 1gb Team Xtream pc6400c3 (ordered) GRAKA: Nvidia 7300GT ddr3 (arrived today)HD: 2 x Seagate 36GB 15K/TR SCSI + Cached controller + 120mm fan (running hot when no active cooling near to it) POWER: Seasonic 80+ 600W or Gamexstream 700W cooling method: AIR Last edited by duploxxx : 23rd June 2007 at 10:48. |
| | #2 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,416
![]() | so by the end of the week, you'll have no system to test with ![]()
__________________ ![]() |
| |
| | #3 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,416
![]() | for drivers, also try 93.71 from the web http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_2k_93.71.html
__________________ ![]() |
| |
| | #4 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Last edited by jmke : 22nd June 2007 at 10:31. Reason: resize pics & attach |
| | #5 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,416
![]() | I think the cooler on the left might bend the card a bit ![]()
__________________ ![]() |
| |
| | #6 |
|
Posts: n/a
| yeah network was behaving strange......changed it :P did somebody check stock performance? i get a strange performance in 2001se for nature i only have 57,3fps on full standard system, can somebody confirm the score from his setup? http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9218245 Last edited by duploxxx : 23rd June 2007 at 09:48. |
| | #7 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,416
![]() | double post?
__________________ ![]() |
| |
| | #8 |
|
Posts: n/a
| jmke, you're stock score is that without any tweaks? 3DMark2001SE http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9216332 GPU: 666 / MEM: 954 : 119.2 FPS with stock clocks (500/747): 91.1 FPS 3Dmark03 (verification URL to follow) GPU: 666 / MEM: 954 : 47.7 FPS with stock clocks (500/747): 39.9 FPS my 3dmark03 is normal, i got 41,9 fps http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5413063 |
| | #9 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,416
![]() | there's a slight ( ) change in rules, 4xAA no longer required, bench only with 1280x1024 (0xAA); also keep in mind that you can select which bench to run, you only need to run the Nature test; same applies for 3DMark2001SE, disable AA; you should get, at stock GPU clocks a score between 130~140FPS
__________________ ![]() |
| |
| | #10 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,465
![]() | I guess 16bit is not allowed? It gives a boost of +/- 15FPS, so 32bit should be in the rules, no? |
| |
![]() |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gamer's 7300GT worklog | Gamer | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 193 | 30th May 2009 23:18 |
| Cranox 7300GT worklog | Cranox | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 55 | 31st August 2007 20:52 |
| Richie's 7300GT worklog | RichBa5tard | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 5 | 31st August 2007 12:42 |
| Geoffrey's 7300GT worklog | geoffrey | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 81 | 30th August 2007 23:14 |
| Massman's 7300GT worklog | Massman | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 72 | 27th July 2007 09:41 |
| Piotke's 7300GT worklog | piotke | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 14 | 24th July 2007 12:43 |
| cherouke's 7300GT worklog | cherouke | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 18 | 16th July 2007 22:47 |
| Troman's 7300GT worklog | Pardons | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 79 | 9th July 2007 15:38 |
| Teemto's 7300GT worklog | Teemto | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 41 | 1st July 2007 20:42 |
| PowerToTheUsers' 7300GT worklog | PowerToTheUsers | Project Worklogs & Benchmarks | 2 | 21st June 2007 21:08 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |