![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,592
![]() | Last edited by Massman : 26th August 2009 at 20:53. |
| |
| | #2 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,861
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Kinky sticks I really wonder why they are specially Lynfield tagged...
__________________ |
| |
| | #3 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,592
![]() | One of the more good-looking memory kits I've seen ![]() |
| |
| | #4 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,891
![]() | rev. 3.1 means they're micron based. Don't expect too much OC headroom, triple channel 3.1 rev's were not very good. |
| |
| | #5 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,592
![]() | Micron F to be precise |
| |
| | #6 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,473
![]() | we all know by now that raw bandwidth is not what Core i7 is waiting for, so anything even remotely "ok" rated will be plentiful for i5. This kit is all about size; you can run several VMs in your OS and still have plenty of free memory; you can go decadent and put the VM image onto a ramdisk to boost performance of the VM OS to a higher level than the host OS ![]()
__________________ ![]() |
| |
| | #7 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,592
![]() | Just put this kit in for a quick test; ![]() Needed 1.74V (maybe less, just increased 0.1V - doesn't boot at 1.65V) |
| |
| | #8 | |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,891
![]() | Quote: It's Micron so this doesn't surprise me ![]() | |
| |
| | #9 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,592
![]() | Well, it's not that stable or performant. I switched back to 1600CL8 and am hitting higher bandwidth figures. |
| |
| | #10 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,891
![]() | Have you tried with only 2 modules ? |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |