It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Articles & Howto's > On the TestBench - Work In Progress
Core i7 965 - Subzero testing Core i7 965 - Subzero testing
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Core i7 965 - Subzero testing
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 27th February 2009, 19:59   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,465
Massman Freshly Registered
Default Core i7 965 - Subzero testing

Hi everybody!

I've been testing my 965 / GTX295 setup today. Here are some pics and results:







Testing will be continued this night
__________________
Massman is offline  
Old 28th February 2009, 00:08   #2
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you are doing subzero... don't forget IntelBurn! I don't remember anyone using that before for subzero OCing...?
 
Old 28th February 2009, 14:48   #3
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

IntelBurn is not a benchmark proggy AFAIk, no scores to be had; and testing for stability on subzero... for benchmark runs? don't see the point
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 1st March 2009, 02:09   #4
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Heh, I guess I just don't see the point of overclocking if it isn't stable. What's the big deal if some site reaches 6.5GHz and can run some programs. It wouldn't be stable and therefore doesn't mean anything, at least in my view.

Now 6.5GHz that was fully stable and could run anything as if it was at stock, that'd mean something.
 
Old 1st March 2009, 09:44   #5
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,465
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

No, not really; you can be on LN2 24/7 so at one point, it would stop functioning correctly.
__________________
Massman is offline  
Old 1st March 2009, 09:57   #6
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar View Post
Heh, I guess I just don't see the point of overclocking if it isn't stable.
agreed with you on that for daily usage; I run my main system at stock speeds
I rather have extra stability than a few extra Mhz. But there are kinds of overclocking and the goals are different. Subzero OC is all about maximum scores; not stability.

Water/Aircooling setup is more about 24/7 stability
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 1st March 2009, 18:15   #7
[M] Reviewer
 
leeghoofd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,159
leeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registered
Default

I really thought you were pulling our legs Cougar with that IBT remark... seems you weren't :

Some pointers :

IBT used under 64bit OS is sort of a reliable CPU tester, under 32bit it just is not. I've seen it more than once, it's not the absolute Testing tool, far from...
IBT doesn't test Nb and subsystem enough to warrant stability ( although some of the programmers want to argue with me on that point for sure )

I can be a 30 run IBt max memory stable and then prime95 Blend crashes under 10 minutes or one of my folding cores errors : You want to know their reply, you need to run IBT longer... First it was 10-20 passes is enough , now we hear even 50+ runs is normal...

50+ Runs that's total punishment on ya hardware, as it pushes ya CPU temps through the roof... are high temps a better sign of a better testing environment : ABSOLUTELY NOT !!

You got 2 kinds of OC'ing : users getting more out of their hardware, to save money (instead of buying that high end CPU or GPU,...) and get better performance : users like you

And there are The Die Hards Record Seeking I Don't Care If It Break Guys, that use anything else than air or water, on anything they can get their hands on... This to get the best score out of the selected tests on eg HWBOT... They don't care if the rig Bluescreens after a new record of superpi and the score is already validated in a screenshot. They got the(ir) best score... that's what counts for them.

Hope you understand now, if you look for stability in a cpu-z suicide shot, I can tell you already it took them mostly quite some time and tweaking to get there but the rig will just be stable to get that screenshot , prolly nothing more nothing less...

Small example : my E7400

Stable 4Ghz 1.31 Air
Stable 4.2Ghz 1.4 Water
Stable 4.8Ghz Phase
Stable 5-5.2 Ghz Cascade
Max CPU-Z 5.7Ghz
leeghoofd is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TEC on Core i7 965 + Ethylene Glycol Chiller General OC-Team Forum 24 18th February 2009 21:21
Intel Core i7 950 and 975 to replace 940 and 965 jmke WebNews 0 9th February 2009 12:36
Intel Core i7 920, Core i7 965 EE and Intel DX58SO jmke WebNews 0 16th December 2008 14:07
Intel Core i7 Nehalem 965 XE review jmke WebNews 0 24th November 2008 14:48
Intel Core i7 920 and 965 XE CPU Review jmke Articles & Howto's 3 3rd November 2008 21:56
World-first analytical testing for The Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800! windwithme Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding 5 4th June 2006 13:10

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:28.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO