It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Windows 7 smaller, faster than Vista Windows 7 smaller, faster than Vista
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  



Other Recent News
Doom9 Researchers Break BD+
AMD Pifast and Superpi 1M broken by Titon

Similar Stories
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for September 2008
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for August 2007
Windows Vista Review, Part 3: Installing Windows Vista
Microsoft Unveils Windows Vista Product Lineup - 6 versions
List of fixes included in Windows XP Service Pack 2
  
Windows 7 smaller, faster than Vista


 
Thread Tools
2nd November 2008, 22:19 [jmke] - #1
Default Windows 7 smaller, faster than Vista

Following Microsoft’s claims that 7 ran well on a Lenovo S10 netbook, Joanna Stern at Laptop Mag stuck the OS on an EeePC 1000H and *shazam*... it installed. Well, not only did it install but it seems like it actually runs quite well under the future OS. As it happens, 7 is a bit lighter than Vista, sucking up just under 512MB of RAM for itself – and never mind Joanna installing some XP drivers to get it going (you can read a bit into that, actually). The Vista feel is there, but there are a few new features that benefit UMPCs to a point, like the new and improved Network Manager. She was comfortable enough to use it but not to keep it right now. It is, after all, a pre-Beta (with an expiry date most likely).

There are too many question marks surrounding Windows 7 for anyone to get into the particulars, but considering many Linux distros have been stripped down and optimised for UMPCs, we could wander when the Vole will look at a Windows 7 UMPC Edition.

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...-smaller-vista
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:32.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO