Trinity (Piledriver) Integer/FP Performance Higher Than Bulldozer, Clock-for-Clock

Stefan Mileschin · 10th April 2012, 07:23

AMD's upcoming "Trinity" family of desktop and mobile accelerated processing units (APUs) will use up to four x86-64 cores based on the company's newest CPU architecture, codenamed "Piledriver". AMD conservatively estimated performance/clock improvements over current-generation "Bulldozer" architecture, with Piledriver. Citavia put next-generation A10-5800K, and A8-4500M "Trinity" desktop and notebook APUs, and pitted them against several currently-launched processors, from both AMD and Intel.

It found integer and floating-point performance increases clock-for-clock, against Bulldozer-based FX-8150. The benchmark is not multi-threaded, and hence gives us a fair idea of the per core performance. On a rather disturbing note, the performance-per-GHz figures of Piledriver are trailing far behind K12 architecture (Llano, A8-3850), let alone competitive architectures from Intel.

http://www.techpowerup.com/163887/Tr...for-Clock.html

10th April 2012, 07:23	#1
Stefan Mileschin [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania Posts: 27,243	Trinity (Piledriver) Integer/FP Performance Higher Than Bulldozer, Clock-for-Clock AMD's upcoming "Trinity" family of desktop and mobile accelerated processing units (APUs) will use up to four x86-64 cores based on the company's newest CPU architecture, codenamed "Piledriver". AMD conservatively estimated performance/clock improvements over current-generation "Bulldozer" architecture, with Piledriver. Citavia put next-generation A10-5800K, and A8-4500M "Trinity" desktop and notebook APUs, and pitted them against several currently-launched processors, from both AMD and Intel. It found integer and floating-point performance increases clock-for-clock, against Bulldozer-based FX-8150. The benchmark is not multi-threaded, and hence gives us a fair idea of the per core performance. On a rather disturbing note, the performance-per-GHz figures of Piledriver are trailing far behind K12 architecture (Llano, A8-3850), let alone competitive architectures from Intel. http://www.techpowerup.com/163887/Tr...for-Clock.html

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NEW RAW CLOCK SPEED WORLD RECORD by AMD Bulldozer. Running at +8.4Ghz !!	leeghoofd	WebNews	3	15th September 2011 16:08
AMD Bulldozer's Clock-Speeds May Be Higher than 3.50GHz	jmke	WebNews	0	25th November 2010 12:25
Intel Core i3 vs AMD Phenom II X3 - Clock for Clock Comparison	jmke	WebNews	0	5th January 2010 18:35
Turn your old HDD into an RGB Clock	jmke	WebNews	0	7th September 2009 16:03
Intel Bloomfield clock for clock 45% faster in 3DMark Vantage CPU Test	jmke	WebNews	6	4th June 2008 17:02
B3 Opterons shipping now, higher clock speeds coming	jmke	WebNews	0	30th March 2008 19:07
Higher Clock Speeds, No TLB Issues and Better Pricing: The New Phenom	jmke	WebNews	0	27th March 2008 16:13
Multigig promises chip clock performance boost	jmke	WebNews	0	8th May 2006 08:36
Clock going beserk	FreeStyler	Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs	3	19th February 2004 10:17
DDR clock cpu+33	Bosw8er	Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs	5	23rd March 2003 14:58