It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Trademark outfit goes after cyber squitter Trademark outfit goes after cyber squitter
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Trademark outfit goes after cyber squitter
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25th June 2012, 08:38   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 44,018
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Trademark outfit goes after cyber squitter

A New York based brand protection and anti-counterfeiting law firm the Gioconda Law Group has sued Arthur Wesley Kenzie, who is nothing to do with the Duke of Wellington and accused him of cybersquatting, trademark infringement and hacking.

The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction and over $1 million in damages.

According to the JD Journal, Kenzey claims to be a member of Cyber Warfare and Russian Cybercrime Hacking and Information Warfare groups, but what appears to have got Gioconda's goat is that he had registered an internet domain name GiocondoLaw.com as a misspelling of GiacondaLaw.com.

Kenzie created fake e-mail accounts to intentionally intercept private e-mails addressed to the firm's lawyers and staff.

In the court documents, Giaconda said that it sent several test e-mail messages to see if they were delivered to the misspelled emal addresses, and indeed, they were received by active mailboxes.

Kenzie was rumbled when a complaint to the Internet Registrar exposed him. He has also been harvesting misspelled e-mails intended for many major corporations without their knowledge or permission including MasterCard, McDonalds, NewsCorp and McAfee.

It is not the first time that Kenzie has had a brush with the long arm of the law. He has been found guilty of cybersquatting before.

His defence in that case, which involved Lockheed Martin, was that he was performing "research" about Lockheed's emal vulnerabilities.

The panel that handles domain name disputes found that Kenzie's attempts were motivated by bad faith to extort cash. The panel decided that Kenzie himself had created the vulnerabilities that he was researching and that "his purpose was to offer services to the Complainant."

http://news.techeye.net/security/tra...cyber-squitter
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blizzard and Valve ink deal on DOTA trademark Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 15th May 2012 06:26
Chinese Official Says Proview Owns iPad Trademark Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 25th April 2012 06:50
ProView Open To Talks with Apple Over iPad Trademark Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 22nd February 2012 07:27
Apple Faces Fines in China, Possible iPad Ban for Trademark Infringement Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 9th February 2012 08:54
ATI Records “CrossFire” Trademark: Multi-VPU Technology Possibly Got Its Name jmke WebNews 2 20th May 2005 10:37

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:44.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO