It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
The Sorry State of Hardware Reviews The Sorry State of Hardware Reviews
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


The Sorry State of Hardware Reviews
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26th December 2003, 00:22   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,771
jmke has disabled reputation
Default The Sorry State of Hardware Reviews

Couldn't have commented on this article any better then this guy:

Quote:
Being a reviewer myself, I agree in principle with just about everything you said. The only 'beef' I have is you comment about using MBM for testing heatsinks. Yes, it is inaccurate as hell. I will not argue that point. However, for those of us who do not ahve that major cash to shell out for an accurate die simulator (which I have heard can cost up to $3000) I feel that you can use MBM and the BIOS temps for some good.

The key is to do compariative reviews. Run all yout tests and whatnot with Heatsink A and record the MBM temps several times and get the average. Keep everything else constant. Do the same for Heatsink B. Then compare the results.

Are the temps going to be accurate, hell no. Will anyone ever be able to recreate the exact same temps? Probably not. But if Heatsink A gives a temp of 50C and Heatsink B gives 45C it is a fairly safe bet that Heatsink B is the better of the two.
http://forums.devhardware.com/showth...threadid=14593
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2003, 09:39   #2
Xploited Titan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Indeed, if you do some comparisson, no problem if it's inaccurate...

But like everywhere: we never can reproduce the same thing twice...
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2003, 01:39   #3
Tarantula
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In the bios I changed the RAM clock speed from CL2 (or auto) to CL 2.5. This is a simple way to over clock RAM without changing your FSB speed. The Ultra DDR Memory does not advertise on the package that it supports CL2.5. However, I'm proving that it does right now as I use it to write this review. The second benchmark illustrates Ultra's comparison against the same 4 configurations this time with the 2.5 configuration. As you can see, the bandwidth has greatly increased. The competition stands no chance. This might seem a bit unfair because there isn't a CL2.5 setting for those other setups, but that's what you get with THIS memory.




omg funny ****
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hardware Reviews Roundup 25/4 jmke WebNews 0 25th April 2008 17:14
The State of Hardware Accelerated Physics jmke WebNews 0 26th July 2007 13:39
5 New Hardware Reviews on CDRinfo.com Sidney WebNews 0 11th September 2004 16:06
** Thursday Hardware Reviews Roundup ** jmke WebNews 0 1st July 2004 14:44

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO