It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Sorry, Star Trek teleportation is impractical Sorry, Star Trek teleportation is impractical
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Sorry, Star Trek teleportation is impractical
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 4th August 2013, 15:41   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 148,553
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Sorry, Star Trek teleportation is impractical

Star Trek fans will be disappointed to hear that researchers at the University of Leicester have calculated the time and energy required to beam a complete person from the Earth’s surface to a location in space.

The method of teleportation depicted in sci-fi is called called “destructive copying”. This means that a source person is scanned and copied down to the molecular level and then reconstituted at a secondary location.

While they don’t tell you that this would be a suicide machine as the source person would be destroyed during the copying procedure, it would also take huge amounts of energy and bandwidth.

The new study, published by fourth year students at Leicester’s Department of Physics and Astronomy, makes painfully clear it would take a hideously long amount of time to transmit all this information to a source location.

Using a theoretical jaunt from the surface of the Earth to a location in orbit directly above it, the researchers worked out how much data a person is made up of.

The students decided that transferable data could be represented by the DNA pairs that make up genomes in each cell. This means that there are 10 billion bits of information in each cell.

After calculating the amount of information encapsulated in a typical human brain, the total data content was shown to be 2.6x1042 bits.

If you managed to have a bandwidth rate of about 29 to 30 GHz it would take 4.85x1015 years to transmit that amount of data, which is 350,000 times longer than the current age of the Universe.

http://news.techeye.net/science/sorr...is-impractical
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Acer shows off Aspire R7 Star Trek edition Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 6th June 2013 11:00
On the eve of Star Trek Into Darkness, JJ Abrams tells all Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 16th May 2013 08:47
Star Wars & Star Trek are connected says JJ Abrams at DICE 2013 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 11th February 2013 07:28
Star Trek-Like 'Tractor Beam' Has Been Created by Scientists Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 28th January 2013 09:54
Star Trek 2 villain is still an enigma Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 20th July 2012 07:05
Dorn wants to star in a new Star Trek film Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 1st June 2012 07:50
Remastering Star Trek: The Next Generation Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 27th February 2012 08:12
Star Trek 2 Filming has Begun Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 16th January 2012 08:37
Star Trek: The Next Generation is coming to Blu-ray, starting in 2012 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 1 29th September 2011 20:12
Confirmed: R2-D2 Finally Discovered In Star Trek jmke WebNews 25 20th November 2009 21:43

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:52.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO