It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Software will never catch up quad cores Software will never catch up quad cores
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Software will never catch up quad cores
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st November 2007, 10:19   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,578
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Software will never catch up quad cores

A senior executive at AMD was honest enough and told Fudzilla that they believe that Quad cores will be overkill for most mainstream applications from now to eternity. They expect that a normal mainstream user wonít really need a quad core in the next few years as there is not necessity for such processing power.

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...25&Ite mid=35
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2007, 10:20   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,578
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

For mainstream computing this is correct for sure
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2007, 05:37   #3
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Same thing has been said about 1GB hard drives too, wasn't it? Or even 1TB hard drives...
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2007, 05:47   #4
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

It all depends on when the statement was made; since it may contain the element of "time".
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2007, 08:38   #5
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,578
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I don't see any need for Quad Cores for office/home-PC in the next 5 years, as long as you don't intend to run the latest windows version
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2007, 10:04   #6
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think he has a slight bias because he can't make cheap to produce quadcores like Intel can.


If we are stricly looking at the home/office PC, any Pentium D gets the job done.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2007, 19:06   #7
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

I was referring to Kougar's comment; continuity is key to a good dialog.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2007, 19:29   #8
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That was the point of my comment in the first place. Claiming "...they believe that Quad cores will be overkill for most mainstream applications from now to eternity." is simply wrong. Same as the article title, never say "never".
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2007, 06:12   #9
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

@ tuyen

Sh*t, I just deleted your craps. Feeling much better.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

Last edited by Sidney : 4th December 2007 at 06:48.
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2007, 06:30   #10
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The most important part is when he says
Quote:
for most mainstream applications from now to eternity
.
Turn and twist it like you want, but he's right because most mainstream applications don't need a lot of processing power. You don't need a 5GHz octacore with 64Mb L2 cache to write a simple report in Writer.
Less mainstream applications (eg. Adobes CS3) that do require a lot of computing power and applications that are used in a business where time is a lot of money will support quad cores.

I actualy think that most applications that have been re-coded for dual cores will probably start supporting 4 cores when these cpus become more mainstream, because a lot less re-coding has to be done.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Athlon II X4 610e & Phenom II X4 910e: 45W & 65W Quad Cores jmke WebNews 0 1st July 2010 12:26
Prijsschatting supermicro bordje en 2 quad cores en ... piotke Mad Bargains 0 12th April 2010 10:52
Patriot Memory Releases 8GB DDR2 6400LL Quad Kit geoffrey WebNews 0 3rd March 2009 22:03
Cheap Quad Cores: AMD X4 9600 Ä99 and Intel Q6600 Ä126 jmke WebNews 0 4th August 2008 12:48
Quad Cores are not needed, for now... jmke WebNews 0 6th November 2006 12:29
Intel uncorks quad cores and a teraflop chip piotke WebNews 0 27th September 2006 17:29
Quad cores to arrive in 1Q 2007, with Intelís Kentsfield and AMDís K8L jmke WebNews 0 27th March 2006 17:54
AMD Applauds Microsoft's Decision to License Server Software by Processor Sidney WebNews 1 20th October 2004 01:32
Leading Software Vendors Endorse AMD64 Multi-Core Technology Sidney WebNews 0 8th September 2004 02:43
IBM Storage Virtualization Software to Manage Massive Amounts of Data Sidney WebNews 0 26th May 2004 00:36

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:20.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO