| ||Thread Tools|
|31st May 2013, 06:18||#1|
Join Date: May 2010
SanDisk splutters at Moore's Law
It appears that SanDisk has been talking up some technology which is a spectacular failure for Moore's Law.
For those who came in late, Moore's Law is the self-fulfilling prophecy that transistor counts on integrated circuits double every two years. It has been working pretty much as a prophecy since Moore came up with it.
But SanDisk seems to have managed to break the law with its 1Y generation of NAND flash nonvolatile memory. It has announced that it would be manufactured using 19-nm minimum geometry which is the the same as its 1X generation.
1X-nm is a term coined to denote a manufacturing process node somewhere between 10- and 19-nm. 1Y and 1Z imply nodes also between 10- and 19-nm but different to the 1X node.
According to eeTimes, SanDisk stared into the abyss of triple or quadruple patterning using masks and immersion lithography to define minimum geometries of 15-nm.
It thought while the technical possibility of getting to 15 or even 10-nm with multiple patterning was straight forward enough, there were too many concerns about the extra dwell time on machines, the complexity of additional process steps and the impact on yield.
SanDisk found a way to improve the memory cell through design by reducing the area by about 25 percent without scaling the geometry.
All this lateral thinking certainly runs against the "spirit" of Moore's Law. But really this sort of thing could have been predicted a while back as his black and white principles started to grey. First there was the introduction of such terms like 1X, 1Y and 1Z which are pretty confusing, and in the logic world FinFET processes are also chucking a spanner in the works. After all they are based on 20-nm back-end of line processes but labelled at 16-nm and 14-nm.
What appears to be really happening is that it is no longer economical to move to the next manufacturing process node and that means, for some, Moore's law is not the ultimate truth.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Chip development makes Moore's Law 'irrelevant' says HP||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||9th July 2012 13:00|
|Nvidia declares Moore's law dead||jmke||WebNews||0||3rd May 2010 15:04|
|3-D Chips: IBM Moves Moore's Law Into The Third Dimension||jmke||WebNews||3||16th April 2007 12:29|
|Moore's Law Staying Strong Through 30nm||jmke||WebNews||0||20th February 2006 20:47|
|Moore's Law lives||Sidney||WebNews||0||5th November 2005 02:50|
|Pace of Moore's Law to Slowdown – Industry Experts.||jmke||WebNews||0||19th September 2005 18:05|
|Interview with Microsoft's Peter Moore||Sidney||WebNews||0||13th September 2004 05:05|
|Intel Drives Moore's Law Forward with 65 Nanometer||Sidney||WebNews||2||30th August 2004 16:43|
|The future of Prescott: when Moore gives you lemons...||jmke||WebNews||0||21st June 2004 09:59|