It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Sam (TeamOCX) breaks 8min barrier in SuperPi 32M Sam (TeamOCX) breaks 8min barrier in SuperPi 32M
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Sam (TeamOCX) breaks 8min barrier in SuperPi 32M
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th July 2008, 19:26   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Icon17 Sam (TeamOCX) breaks 8min barrier in SuperPi 32M

More overclocking news! A Latvian overclocker named Sam/Tapakah, accompanied by MrLobber, managed to break the SuperPi 32M record and be the first to do it in less than 8 minutes!


Thanks to a lot of system tweaking, he only needed an 5770MHz E8500 to do the job. Used cooling system is liquid nitrogen, obviously. Word on the street goes that, equipped with an E8600, he'll be breaking other barriers soon!

http://www.ocxtreme.org/forumenus/sh...ad.php?p=47130
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 11th July 2008 at 19:31.
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 19:28   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

while it's true that the E8600 will be binned higher than E8500, it doesn't necessarily mean it will overclock higher too
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 19:32   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

The main issue with the E8400 and E8500 are the FSB speeds. Not much DDR3 motherboards can hit high FSB speeds. As the E8600 is equiped with a multiplier of 10, benching at 6GHz (600x10), will be easy.
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 19:35   #4
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

are there plans for an extreme dual core Wolfdale ala X series from before? That would sell
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 20:06   #5
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

Multiplier of 10 is enough, no need for an Extreme version.
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 22:32   #6
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

not as easy as MP change without FSB hassle
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 22:47   #7
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

Physical frequency limit of Wolfdale will be around 6.5-6.6G, meaning that with MP of 10, you'll be able to hit the limit of the cpu sooner than you'll hit the limit of the FSB
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 22:52   #8
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I'm talking about the easiness of OC which the X series really did, since the X6800 was the most expensive at launch, OCing with MP didn't rob any sales
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 22:58   #9
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

Okay, it would be easier in theory, however, if you buy a trusted oc-motherboard, it'll do 550FSB for sure. I'd like to see the person who needs an unlocked MP to find the limits of their cpu on air cooling. 550x10 is not doable, let alone 550x11 and higher.
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 23:04   #10
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I'm talking about those who want the fastest out there with no hassle. No guess work, no tinkering. Just increase MP until bluescreen, lower MP. Done

those people have the $$ dual core > quad core Mhz wise, and single threaded apps will go faster on that system.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel 32nm Clarkdale breaks SuperPi record: 6.344 - running 6.76Ghz under LN2 jmke WebNews 3 30th December 2009 21:22
End-User Breaks 7Ghz Barrier with retail AMD Phenom II X4 965 CPU jmke WebNews 0 30th November 2009 09:39
AMD CPU Breaks 7Ghz Barrier jmke WebNews 0 7th July 2009 19:56
Overclocked Core 2 E6700 @ 5693 breaks 9 Second SuperPi Barrier jmke WebNews 2 31st May 2007 22:35
Core 2 Duo 1333 breaks 3GHz barrier jmke WebNews 2 19th December 2006 23:11
Subzero cooled Core 2 at 5525Mhz breaks SuperPi record - 9.000s jmke WebNews 0 3rd August 2006 20:44
Maxtor Breaks 500GB Barrier jmke WebNews 0 25th October 2005 22:34

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:38.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO