It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Robot assisted doctors create legal questions Robot assisted doctors create legal questions
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Robot assisted doctors create legal questions
Thread Tools
Old 28th March 2013, 07:30   #1
[M] Reviewer
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 144,110
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Robot assisted doctors create legal questions

The future of robot surgery is becoming mired because the US legal system cannot work out who can be sued if something goes wrong or if doctors are getting enough training on the gear.

More than 2,500 da Vinci robots are at work in world hospitals and generally their work means less blood loss, smaller scars and quicker recovery time.

But there have been a few accidents. In 2007, surgeons in Aalst, Belgium, had a surgical robot's arm broke off inside a patient with prostate cancer. The instrument was so badly bent it could not be removed through the original keyhole incision.

The firm that makes da Vinci, Intuitive Surgical, has attracted the attention of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which is asking surgeons about the system.

There are 10 product liability lawsuits have been filed against da Vinci's makers in the past 14 months.

The FDA wants to find out if the rise in reports is a true reflection of problems, or simply an increase due to other factors.

And this is the problem. If the robot is breaking, you sue Intuitive Surgical, if the problem is caused by a badly trained surgeon, you sue the hospital, if it is dodgy doctors playing with a patient like they are a computer game you sue them.

This question appears to be overtaking the more important fact that the robot aims to offer minimally invasive, highly accurate surgery with a human in control at all times.

The technology allows a surgeon to handle the instruments on the robot's four arms from a console with a stereoscopic 3D view of the operation, magnified up to ten times.

But if the surgeon is not using the robot correctly, how does the insurance company prove that? If they sue the company, then that is hardly fair if the surgeon cocked up.

James Breeden, president of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists told New Scientist that studies show there is a learning curve with new surgical technologies, during which there is an increased complication rate. Some surgeons only get two days' training on da Vinci.
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glove Tricorder helps train doctors, may lead to DIY cancer screening Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 24th August 2012 17:59
Ringbow hits Kickstarter, promises directional pad-assisted touch gaming Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 25th June 2012 08:24
Cybram 001 simulator helps doctors practice brain surgery without risking lives (vide Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 19th April 2012 07:32
FDA spied on doctors and scientists Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 1st February 2012 07:13
Experience of Pirated DVD vs Legal DVD jmke WebNews 4 21st February 2010 00:12
Swiftech MCW6500-T TEC (Peltier) Assisted Water Block jmke WebNews 0 15th June 2007 05:47
Is it legal to use someone's Wi-Fi connection Sidney WebNews 0 11th July 2005 12:12
Looking at Legal Music Downloading Sidney WebNews 0 29th December 2004 16:01

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:13.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO