It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
The reason why AMD's Vega power was high The reason why AMD's Vega power was high
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


The reason why AMD's Vega power was high
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th June 2018, 12:40   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 148,500
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default The reason why AMD's Vega power was high

Power optimization engineers went to EPYC

It is no big secret that Vega 64 and 56 had quite high thermals and didn’t actually meet some of its performance targets. Some key power optimization engineers were pulled from the Vega team to the more important goal. The Naples server chip had a higher priority.

When you design any SoC or chip, you have some targets with frequency, performance and power that needs to be met in order to mass produce the chip for reasonable costs and volumes. This sensitive math is an oversimplification of several years of work.

The Vega chip actually looked much more competitive in the development phase compared to the product launch. One of the reasons why was that some key power optimization engineers were pulled from the Vega team to the server Naples team.
Power gurus went to EPYC

The server, chip now known as EPYC had more priority for long-term performance and the survival of AMD and we definitely agree with this assessment. But since AMD doesn’t have a lot of talented engineers sitting around, moving some people from one group to another could affect the end result.

AMD knew that gaining any market share in server would look good with investors and stock holders and had to make a very promising chip. Even today, almost a year after the EPYC launch, AMD is having limited success, but it did manage to win some key customers and continues to grow.

Taking key talents from GPU and moving them to the server business meant that EPYC has some impressive power to performance ratios but at the same time Vega didn’t. Our well informed sources didn’t want to reveal the names but there are not that many power optimization magicians working in these chip companies, it comes down to a few people. A great leader with a decent team can do a great job.

We cannot blame it all only on that decision but at the shipping clocks that were safe to mass produce for Vega 64, the chip has a higher TDP and power than planned and predicted. At least now it makes a bit more sense.

https://fudzilla.com/news/graphics/4...power-was-high
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gigabyte announces its custom RX Vega 64/Vega 56 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 2nd December 2017 05:19
The Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid, Vega 64 & Vega 56 Test Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 26th August 2017 13:45
AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 and RX Vega 56 graphics cards reviewed Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 15th August 2017 13:24
AMD Radeon RX Vega needs a lot of power Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 24th June 2017 06:02
AMD RX Vega - Radeon Vega Frontier Die Shot Faked Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 7th June 2017 05:51
AMD RX Vega - Radeon Vega Frontier Die Shot Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 7th June 2017 05:51
AMD Unveils the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition: Vega Starts in the Pros Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 20th May 2017 09:14
Should You Use the Balanced, Power Saver, or High Performance Power Plan on Windows? Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 10th February 2016 07:19
High Power Rock Solid 1200w Power Supply Sidney WebNews 0 22nd January 2008 16:05
High Power, Power Watcher 480Watt Power Supply jmke WebNews 0 28th July 2005 22:53

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:06.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO