It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Nvidia Geforce GTX480 "Fermi" is broken and unfixable Nvidia Geforce GTX480 "Fermi" is broken and unfixable
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Nvidia Geforce GTX480 "Fermi" is broken and unfixable
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 17th February 2010, 20:46   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,716
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Nvidia Geforce GTX480 "Fermi" is broken and unfixable

We first got word that production A3 GF100s were back in Santa Clara near the end of January. When enough of them rolled off the line to characterize the silicon, we hear there were no parties in Santa Clara. For those not interested in the 'why' side of things, the short answer is that the top bin as it stands now is about 600MHz for the half hot clock, and 1200MHz for the hot clock, and the initial top part will have 448 shaders. On top of that, the fab wafer yields are still in single digit percentages.

That said, the situation is far more nuanced than those three numbers suggest, and the atrocious yields are even after the chip has been downclocked and defective units fused off. To make matters even worse, the problems that caused these low yields are likely unfixable without a complete re-layout.

http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/02/...and-unfixable/
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2010, 20:49   #2
[M] Reviewer
 
leeghoofd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,157
leeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registered
Default

John semiaccurate is the new fuadzilla... if he can bash Nvidia he will, being true or not, people still readup on his articles... amasing...

Take with a big grain of salt and sometimes better a whole package
__________________
leeghoofd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2010, 22:48   #3
Oberon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Decrease the severity of anything Charlie says about NVIDIA by half and cut out anything clearly intended to raise the ire of fanboys and you've got something relatively close to the truth, usually.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 00:11   #4
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think the info makes far more sense when combined with what Anand has said regarding TSMC's problematic 40nm process... Really bad timing to be launching a huge chip on that, even ATI needed a few extra tries before they worked around the TSMC process problem.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 04:53   #5
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rather than read an excellent example of yet another long, biased tirade... try this article:

http://www.semiconductor.net/article...fects-full.php
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 15:07   #6
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,716
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Hey Albrecht, I'm well aware that SA has to be taken with a huge grain of salt, his articles are provocative, not always based on fact, but derived from rumors and guesses;
nevertheless it's interesting to follow his train of though and see what conclusions he draws from the data he somehow obtained;

so far, the accuracy of reports by TheInq,Fudz , SA and other rumor sites has been increasing over the years, where as before any article posted by TheInq was completely fake and debunked when the actual product was launched; but nowadays, the guess work seems to be a lot more in the ballpark, sometimes right on the dot.

all things said, those sites are fun appetizers while we wait for main dish

next article:
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/02/...t-want-answer/
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 17:53   #7
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well I read his articles because he'd tell you facts, then spin them his own way... could at least get some facts out of his articles. But it gets annoying to shift through blatantly made up spin, it's worse than the news media. He even links to Anand's article, yet his goes against half of what was said in it. Lately he seems to be on hyper-mode with the hate... maybe when he writes less like a angsty 18 year old I'll go back to reading that site.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 18:13   #8
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,716
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Reply from nvidia.
http://twitter.com/RS_Borsti
Oh Charlie... that just another hilarious post

http://twitter.com/Igor_Stanek
Oh Charlie... that just another hilarious post me: I think with this post Charlie totally destroyed his credibility
src: XS
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO