It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  



Other Recent News
Intel Q9650 3.00GHz Quad Core Processor
Zotac GeForce GTX 260 Ampē Edition 216 Shaders

Similar Stories
Zotac GeForce GTX 260 Ampē Edition 216 Shaders
EVGA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 (216 SP) Superclocked Edition Review
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 and 260: Gaming Performance Review
  
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216


 
Thread Tools
16th September 2008, 19:21 [jmke] - #1
Default NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We tested seven games. AMD and NVIDIA split it, each winning three of them and virtually tied in the seventh. I hate to disappoint those looking for a one sided fight here, but this one is a wash. NVIDIA would want to point out that CUDA and PhysX are significant advantages that would put the Core 216 over the top but honestly there's no compelling application for either (much like the arguments for Havok and DirectX 10.1 from the AMD camp).

Our recommendation here is to first see if either card happens to run a game you care about better than the other, but if not then just buy whatever is cheaper. Today that would be the Radeon HD 4870, currently it's very tough to find stock-clocked Core 216s and those are priced above $300; even if we could find availability at $279, the 4870 is still cheaper. Until the price comes down, the Radeon HD 4870 still remains our pick at the $250 - $300 pricepoint. While NVIDIA has closed the performance gap, the part they used still maintains a price gap.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3408
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:40.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO