nVidia Geforce FX 5700 Ultra

jmke · 27th October 2003, 12:48

nvidia's back? this $200 card reaches almost the performance of ATi's $500 one!

27th October 2003, 12:59

bad choice screenshot

in most of the benches the 9600 is up ahead

even the ti4200 is better then a rad9600xt if you follow your subjective screen..

27th October 2003, 18:57

I was terrified lol .. the new budgetcard from nvidia performing better then my new 9800pro .. thk god it's only in this benchmark

Still a nice bang for the buck

jmke · 27th October 2003, 19:00

Quote:

Originally posted by anes
bad choice screenshot

I would rather call it a "provoking" one
urging the reader to check out the article :-)

the 5700U is still the better buy in the end, the R9600 Pro has been beaten

RichBa5tard · 27th October 2003, 19:43

Beaten, no. A very worthy competetor, yes.

The price difference between a R9600 Pro and a FX5600U is pretty big (tones.be: 170 vs 220). I think it will take a while before you'll see a FX5700U < 200, while you can get a equally fast R9600Pro right now for far less.

jmke · 27th October 2003, 20:40

I stand corrected, thought the price would be lower of the 5700U

27th October 2003, 23:34

shouldn't your little side-info give 'first-sight' what to expect?

i've read it last week, but for people with less time, it should be more of a summary of the article no?

a superficial individual may think 'wow, nvidia is all back' and yet another misunderstanding is launched into the world..

jmke · 27th October 2003, 23:38

in a way nvidia is back, since everything else they have released in the months since the GF4 series , is lacking in the price/speed departement. This 5700U actually brings it back up to speed, and it delivers a pretty good bang 4 the buck !

the small info is only a teaser, a glimpse of the full article, not particulary a summary of the whole article, not in my newsposts at least

I chose this screenshot because it was one of the most controversial ones, in the article there's an even better one, where even the Ti4200 outperforms the 9800XT

28th October 2003, 15:33

I hope that we will be able to buy this card arround christmas for about €180. My ti4200 is getting a wee bit to slow.

To bad that there aren't 3dmark2k1 bechmarks.

piotke · 28th October 2003, 20:37

Quote:

Originally posted by Vulk
I hope that we will be able to buy this card arround christmas for about €180. My ti4200 is getting a wee bit to slow.

c'mon, i tought the same a year ago, and now i'm gaming on a mx480, fluently, high detail, on 1024*768

27th October 2003, 12:48	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	nVidia Geforce FX 5700 Ultra nvidia's back? this $200 card reaches almost the performance of ATi's $500 one! __________________

27th October 2003, 19:43	#5
RichBa5tard [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 3,344	Beaten, no. A very worthy competetor, yes. The price difference between a R9600 Pro and a FX5600U is pretty big (tones.be: 170 vs 220). I think it will take a while before you'll see a FX5700U < 200, while you can get a equally fast R9600Pro right now for far less. __________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini \| Core Duo 1.6Ghz \| 2GB DDR2 \| 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook \| Core 2 2.0Ghz \| 4GB DDR2 \| 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz \| HD3850 OC \| Asrock 4coredual-vsta \| 2GB DDR2

27th October 2003, 20:40	#6
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	I stand corrected, thought the price would be lower of the 5700U __________________

27th October 2003, 23:38	#8
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	in a way nvidia is back, since everything else they have released in the months since the GF4 series , is lacking in the price/speed departement. This 5700U actually brings it back up to speed, and it delivers a pretty good bang 4 the buck ! the small info is only a teaser, a glimpse of the full article, not particulary a summary of the whole article, not in my newsposts at least I chose this screenshot because it was one of the most controversial ones, in the article there's an even better one, where even the Ti4200 outperforms the 9800XT __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Driverheaven Nvidia Mobility Modder Released V1.1.0.0	jmke	WebNews	0	6th August 2009 13:12
NVidia considers an across-the-board overhaul of its marketing strategy	Shogun	WebNews	4	9th May 2008 13:08
Nvidia GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB Performance Unveiled	jmke	WebNews	8	2nd May 2007 18:17
Nvidia Preps GeForce 8800 Ultra – Listing in Drivers	jmke	WebNews	1	7th March 2007 03:42
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra PCX Review	Da_BoKa	WebNews	1	16th November 2004 14:54
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	Sidney	WebNews	0	1st November 2004 20:19
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra Debuts in Retail - InnoVISION Rolls-Out First GeForce 6800	jmke	WebNews	0	25th May 2004 13:58

27th October 2003, 12:59	#2
anes Posts: n/a	bad choice screenshot in most of the benches the 9600 is up ahead even the ti4200 is better then a rad9600xt if you follow your subjective screen..

27th October 2003, 18:57	#3
SpoBo Posts: n/a	I was terrified lol .. the new budgetcard from nvidia performing better then my new 9800pro .. thk god it's only in this benchmark Still a nice bang for the buck

27th October 2003, 23:34	#7
anes Posts: n/a	shouldn't your little side-info give 'first-sight' what to expect? i've read it last week, but for people with less time, it should be more of a summary of the article no? a superficial individual may think 'wow, nvidia is all back' and yet another misunderstanding is launched into the world..

28th October 2003, 15:33	#9
Vulk Posts: n/a	I hope that we will be able to buy this card arround christmas for about €180. My ti4200 is getting a wee bit to slow. To bad that there aren't 3dmark2k1 bechmarks.