NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 512MB G92 Tested

Sidney · 29th November 2007, 04:13

Getting down to the nitty gritty there are some key details we should make mention of. Based on the new G92 core, we have the standard features to come with it such as PCI Express 2.0, a 65nm die and 1:1 texture addressing units : texture filtering units.

These are the features we know to be standard across all of the upcoming 8800GTS G92 based graphics cards, but as far as model specifics go we have in this case 512MB of GDDR3 memory. That 512MB comes clocked in at 1940MHz DDR while the core and shader clocks come in at 650MHz and 1625MHz respectively.

http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/12...ted/index.html

29th November 2007, 07:00

Hmm, 320mb of RAM is definitely a bad idea at 1920x1200 games, amazing difference in performance between 320mb GTS and 512mb GTS at that resolution in virtually every game.

thorgal · 29th November 2007, 12:27

Now the GTX lineup can definately move over and be forgotten about...

29th November 2007, 15:44

It could be very interesting because of the better cooler which is working as exhaust as well.

The raw price performance of the GT will probably be better but with the cooler the GTS might be equal.

jmke · 29th November 2007, 21:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by thorgal

Now the GTX lineup can definately move over and be forgotten about...

unless you already have one, you'll know it will last another few months for running games at high settings without issue

30th November 2007, 12:16

With the Crysis results now added, the 8800GTS (G92) beats out the 8800GTX at 1920x1200. It lost by a good margin at 1280x1024, so G92 definitely has much better scaling, beat GTX by ~2FPS and came within 2FPS of the Ultra.

jmke · 30th November 2007, 14:19

equally matched; only take into account High detail settings, wouldn't want to switch to medium size texture just to be able to play at 1920x1200

29th November 2007, 04:13	#1
Sidney Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,738	NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTS 512MB G92 Tested Getting down to the nitty gritty there are some key details we should make mention of. Based on the new G92 core, we have the standard features to come with it such as PCI Express 2.0, a 65nm die and 1:1 texture addressing units : texture filtering units. These are the features we know to be standard across all of the upcoming 8800GTS G92 based graphics cards, but as far as model specifics go we have in this case 512MB of GDDR3 memory. That 512MB comes clocked in at 1940MHz DDR while the core and shader clocks come in at 650MHz and 1625MHz respectively. http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/12...ted/index.html __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

29th November 2007, 12:27	#3
thorgal [M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 1,887	Now the GTX lineup can definately move over and be forgotten about... __________________

30th November 2007, 14:19	#7
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	equally matched; only take into account High detail settings, wouldn't want to switch to medium size texture just to be able to play at 1920x1200 __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Driverheaven Nvidia Mobility Modder Released V1.1.0.0	jmke	WebNews	0	6th August 2009 13:12
NVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX 512MB	Massman	WebNews	0	24th June 2008 08:34
NVidia considers an across-the-board overhaul of its marketing strategy	Shogun	WebNews	4	9th May 2008 13:08
Asus EN8800GTS (NVIDIA 8800GTS) TOP 512MB	jmke	WebNews	0	27th February 2008 21:11
ZOTAC GeForce 8800GTS 512MB G92	Sidney	WebNews	0	12th December 2007 15:12
Sparkle GeForce 8800GTS 512MB	Sidney	WebNews	0	12th December 2007 00:36
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB: Asus and XFX	Sidney	WebNews	0	12th December 2007 00:27

29th November 2007, 07:00	#2
Kougar Posts: n/a	Hmm, 320mb of RAM is definitely a bad idea at 1920x1200 games, amazing difference in performance between 320mb GTS and 512mb GTS at that resolution in virtually every game.

29th November 2007, 15:44	#4
Rutar Posts: n/a	It could be very interesting because of the better cooler which is working as exhaust as well. The raw price performance of the GT will probably be better but with the cooler the GTS might be equal.

30th November 2007, 12:16	#6
Kougar Posts: n/a	With the Crysis results now added, the 8800GTS (G92) beats out the 8800GTX at 1920x1200. It lost by a good margin at 1280x1024, so G92 definitely has much better scaling, beat GTX by ~2FPS and came within 2FPS of the Ultra.