It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Matrox new M9125 video card tested and compared Matrox new M9125 video card tested and compared
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Matrox new M9125 video card tested and compared
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th February 2009, 20:36   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Matrox new M9125 video card tested and compared

Actually this article earns no correct result, but rather an evaluation its that we measured there and saw. Because it finally concerns not a regular Review of the Matrox M9125 - one wanted the map in applications and applications such to employ, would have one to test, for which she is actually meant. This we did not do here however, but did not throw the Office map of Matrox into the shark fish basin to that of play bench mark, where them do not belong rather reliably.

Therefore the measured values also not particularly surprise - the Matrox M9125 is built not to the play fitness and offers these only besides ago from there as waste product anyway of the technology already existing. And so seen it is not completely bad, which offers Matrox here also on plays completely unoptimierten drivers: One lies somewhere in the proximity of the integrated X4500-Grafik von Intel, which is surely no achievement miracle, but is evenly nevertheless explicitly for the play employment conceived and had a thereupon-working driver team.

Because exactly this is the keyword: Optimizations of the driver on plays and/or efficiency generally. Here the really rare situation arrives that we it with the Matrox Grafikkarte with one on plays probably completely unoptimierten drivers to do have, probably gives it not even particularly fastidious performance optimizations generally (for which also). Which lets itself escape Matrox hereby at possible performance, is not even to estimate - somewhere within the range of 30 to 50 per cent, if we may dare the view into the glass ball.

http://66.196.80.202/babelfish/trans...125-benchmarks
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAID 0 Stripe Sizes Compared with SSDs - OCZ Vertex Drives Tested jmke Articles & Howto's 11 19th January 2010 13:36
[M] RAID 0 Stripe Sizes Compared with SSDs - OCZ Vertex Drives Tested jmke WebNews 1 15th January 2010 15:43
Video Card Comparison Charts jmke Articles & Howto's 3 18th October 2009 18:10
[M] Video Card Comparison Charts jmke WebNews 1 15th September 2009 19:53
Eight Video Card Coolers Tested and Compared jmke Articles & Howto's 10 29th January 2008 22:37
[M] Eight Video Card Coolers Tested and Compared jmke WebNews 0 18th July 2007 15:27
[M] 10 Geforce 8800 GTS 320Mb Video Cards Compared jmke WebNews 0 30th April 2007 15:39
101 Video Cards Compared (hunderd and one!) jmke WebNews 1 18th October 2004 08:07
VGA Charts IV: AGP Video Cards compared jmke WebNews 1 6th October 2004 14:53

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO