| Thread Tools |
31st July 2008, 09:47 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| Low-End Single/Dual-Core CPUs: Leisurely Computing AMD processors are still doing fine in the Low-End segment (unlike the High-End). The cheapest dual-core processors offer similar performance. Sempron is outperformed by Celeron, but not as much as Phenom X4 by Core 2 Extreme. There is still a small fly in the ointment: AMD processors are not only slower, they are also much hotter. Not as hot as the notorious NetBurst, of course. But power consumption of K8 is still significantly higher than that of Intel Core. However, with the peak value of 40 W, many people will just not pay much attention to it. http://www.digit-life.com/articles3/...e-1100-p1.html
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaked Intel Roadmap Details New Fall Core CPUs | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st June 2010 10:19 |
Intel Plans Core i7 and Core i5 CPUs for Notebooks in 2010 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 13th November 2009 14:00 |
Intel planning Core i7 950 Replacement before end of 2009 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 13th June 2009 12:09 |
Noctua presents NH-U12P SE1366 for Intel Core i7 CPUs | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th November 2008 21:46 |
29 CPUs compared, including Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 5th July 2006 10:05 |
NVidia launches the 7300GS - Low End Cards with PS3.0 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th January 2006 19:53 |
Thread Tools | |
| |