Latest migrations show SSD is ready for some datacenters

jmke · 20th October 2009, 16:56

When we asked the IT pros in the Server Room to name the number one barrier to solid state disk (SSD) adoption in the enterprise, "price" was the near unanimous consensus. SSD storage is still significantly more expensive than rotating magnetic media, but with datacenters becoming ever more constrained by power and cooling considerations, the overall price picture for SSD vs. HDD keeps getting better. Sure, at the level of an individual drive, the cost/GB difference between SSD and HDD is still huge, but at the level of the overall datacenter, with floor space, power, and cooling factored in, the delta now looks a lot smaller.

http://arstechnica.com/business/news... campaign=rss

blackened · 20th October 2009, 20:13

Our production servers that host data at my company are all basically disk limited. They are all 100 nodes clusters each running 2 1tb 15k SAS drives using the SuperMicro twin servers. We just recently started testing these in smaller clusters using 4 160gb Intel SSDs in 2 raid0 arrays. Those 10 servers can keep up with the requests going to the 100 node clusters, but right now the capacity is whats holding us back from moving them into production. The slower write isnt really a problem for us because the data is only updated once a day 5 days a week, and clusters are pulled out of production while updated.

20th October 2009, 20:21

I'de be surprised if many companies would trade regular disks that have already proven their reliabilty for SSD that are relatively new.

jmke · 20th October 2009, 20:27

I would never utter the words reliability and HDDs in the same sentence when it comes down to single disks

we've got another few disk failures last month

21st October 2009, 06:40

Yeah, some people I know just had a bunch of HDDs die out... scary how it is quiet for a few months, then suddenly three or four people you know have one or even two drives die (or slowly fail) on them.

Many of the hard drives were only 3 years old... I bet with typical usage an Intel SSD easily would outlast 3 years... better question is if it can last 5. SLC based SSD's should easily last beyond 5...

20th October 2009, 16:56	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	Latest migrations show SSD is ready for some datacenters When we asked the IT pros in the Server Room to name the number one barrier to solid state disk (SSD) adoption in the enterprise, "price" was the near unanimous consensus. SSD storage is still significantly more expensive than rotating magnetic media, but with datacenters becoming ever more constrained by power and cooling considerations, the overall price picture for SSD vs. HDD keeps getting better. Sure, at the level of an individual drive, the cost/GB difference between SSD and HDD is still huge, but at the level of the overall datacenter, with floor space, power, and cooling factored in, the delta now looks a lot smaller. http://arstechnica.com/business/news... campaign=rss __________________

20th October 2009, 20:27	#4
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	I would never utter the words reliability and HDDs in the same sentence when it comes down to single disks we've got another few disk failures last month __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Super Talent Ships New TeraDrive CT SATA 3Gbps SSDs based on SandForce SSD Processor	jmke	WebNews	0	14th June 2010 20:18
A-DATA show us 200MB/s USB 3.0 SSD and other goodies	jmke	WebNews	0	7th April 2010 13:10
G.Skill Announces Falcon II SATA II 2.5” Solid State Drive (SSD)	jmke	WebNews	0	11th November 2009 12:44
Intel Releases Solid-State Drive Toolbox with Intel® SSD Optimizer	jmke	WebNews	1	26th October 2009 15:24
Seek for MLC SSD Extreme Performance-CORSAIR CMFSSD-64GBG2D PC/NB dual platform test	windwithme	General Madness - System Building Advice	1	21st August 2009 18:09
Open SSD High Performance Territory – Intel X25-M 80GB PC&NB Platform Test	windwithme	General Madness - System Building Advice	6	15th May 2009 08:01
Patriot new Torqx SSD Lineup Features 64Mb Cache	jmke	WebNews	0	12th May 2009 09:03
Sandisk intros 240Gb SSD with 200Mb/s Read, 140Mb/s Write Speeds	jmke	WebNews	0	9th January 2009 17:42
Latest Swiftech Obsidian Videocard Waterblock is Tri-SLI Ready	jmke	WebNews	0	28th July 2008 18:49
BitMICRO 416GB SSD ready in 2008	Sidney	WebNews	0	16th September 2007 17:36

20th October 2009, 20:13	#2
blackened Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 79	Our production servers that host data at my company are all basically disk limited. They are all 100 nodes clusters each running 2 1tb 15k SAS drives using the SuperMicro twin servers. We just recently started testing these in smaller clusters using 4 160gb Intel SSDs in 2 raid0 arrays. Those 10 servers can keep up with the requests going to the 100 node clusters, but right now the capacity is whats holding us back from moving them into production. The slower write isnt really a problem for us because the data is only updated once a day 5 days a week, and clusters are pulled out of production while updated.

20th October 2009, 20:21	#3
wutske Posts: n/a	I'de be surprised if many companies would trade regular disks that have already proven their reliabilty for SSD that are relatively new.

21st October 2009, 06:40	#5
Kougar Posts: n/a	Yeah, some people I know just had a bunch of HDDs die out... scary how it is quiet for a few months, then suddenly three or four people you know have one or even two drives die (or slowly fail) on them. Many of the hard drives were only 3 years old... I bet with typical usage an Intel SSD easily would outlast 3 years... better question is if it can last 5. SLC based SSD's should easily last beyond 5...