It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Lack of Async Compute on Maxwell Makes AMD GCN Better Prepared for DirectX 12 Lack of Async Compute on Maxwell Makes AMD GCN Better Prepared for DirectX 12
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Lack of Async Compute on Maxwell Makes AMD GCN Better Prepared for DirectX 12
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 1st September 2015, 11:26   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 110,605
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Lack of Async Compute on Maxwell Makes AMD GCN Better Prepared for DirectX 12

It turns out that NVIDIA's "Maxwell" architecture has an Achilles' heel after all, which tilts the scales in favor of competing AMD Graphics CoreNext architecture better prepared for DirectX 12. "Maxwell" lacks support for async compute, one of the three highlight features of Direct3D 12, even as the GeForce driver "exposes" the feature's presence to apps. This came to light when game developer Oxide Games claimed that it was pressurized by NVIDIA's marketing department to remove certain features in its "Ashes of the Singularity" DirectX 12 benchmark.

Async Compute is a standardized API-level feature, which allows an app to better exploit the number-crunching resources of a GPU, by breaking down its graphics rendering tasks. Since NVIDIA driver tells apps that "Maxwell" GPUs supports it, Oxide Games simply created its benchmark with async compute support, but when it attempted to use it on Maxwell, it was an "unmitigated disaster." During to course of its developer correspondence with NVIDIA to try and fix this issue, it learned that "Maxwell" doesn't really support async compute at the bare-metal level, and that NVIDIA driver bluffs its support to apps. NVIDIA instead started pressurizing Oxide to remove parts of its code that use async compute altogether, it alleges.

http://www.techpowerup.com/215663/la...irectx-12.html
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Maxwell Makes its Debut: Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 & GTX 980 Review Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 19th September 2014 09:12
3DMark11 Performance Test: DirectX 12 vs DirectX 11 jmke WebNews 0 21st March 2014 12:51
How I prepared for MOA Americas Qualifier @ Ninjalane Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 22nd May 2012 07:29
Dirt 2 CPU benchmarks with DirectX 9 and DirectX 11: Phenom doing well jmke WebNews 0 7th December 2009 08:51
Dirt 2: DirectX 9 vs. DirectX 11 graphics compared jmke WebNews 1 24th November 2009 08:55
Resident Evil 5: PC vs. Xbox 360 and DirectX 9 vs. DirectX 10 - graphics comparison jmke WebNews 0 23rd July 2009 13:09
DirectX 11 Compute Shader: Three times faster than DX10.1 due to Local Data Share jmke WebNews 0 16th July 2009 14:08
DirectX 11 Allows Execution of Compute Shaders on DirectX 10, 10.1 Hardware jmke WebNews 0 15th April 2009 22:36
Windows and Linux Not Well Prepared For Multicore Chips jmke WebNews 0 23rd March 2009 13:18
Be prepared for some top-notch Spire products at CeBIT jmke WebNews 0 3rd March 2005 10:14

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:38.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO