It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel succeeds in making overclocking uncool Intel succeeds in making overclocking uncool
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel succeeds in making overclocking uncool
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th January 2011, 20:34   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Intel succeeds in making overclocking uncool

Overclocking with Intel's new 2nd Generation Sandy Bridge K Skus is so easy even your grandma can do it and get extra performance out of her PC for the things she need most.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...1CfUA&fmt= 22
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2011, 20:39   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

welcome to 1993; first Pentium released, locked multiplier, locked FSB, than came the motherboards with unlocked FSB option
Intel has completed their plan to commercialize overclocking, it was a long road, but now they finally did it;

18 years since the first pentium, they have finally locked it down enough to make it too hard to "easily" overclock your Intel CPU and get more value for money. Now you have to pay more to get an "overclockable" CPU, thereby defeating the original purpose of getting more value out of your purchase by running your CPU overclocked. Couple this with the fact that CPU speed is hardly the limiting factor or bottleneck in today's PCs, and you realize it's marketing, nothing more and nothing less.

Enthusiasts might still get a kick out of buying the Special K versions and running them under LN2; mainstreamers who bought P4 2.4 to run them at 3.2ghz or E6400 to run them at 3.6Ghz will hardly see the point in spending more money for a performance boost that's not noticeable in day to day computing.

I'd rather have no Turboboost and all CPUs running at their max speed all the time (it's still consume less than the Presscot P4s), at least then we might see some incentive for upgrading our desktop systems, don't you agree? (not talking about gaming, OC rigs here, but the average Joe rig)
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core-i3/i5/i7 LGA1156 Overclocking Guide jmke WebNews 0 24th August 2010 09:16
Intel Core i7 Overclocking: 130 Watt Speed Limit jmke WebNews 5 6th November 2008 02:53
Low budget 45 nm - Intel E7200 overclocking report piotke Articles & Howto's 5 15th June 2008 20:46
[M] Low budget 45 nm - Intel E7200 overclocking report piotke WebNews 1 15th June 2008 00:15
Overclocking at Intel jmke WebNews 0 5th May 2007 09:34
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6700 Overclocking jmke WebNews 0 31st August 2006 10:48
Intel Core Duo Overclocking Experience jmke WebNews 3 20th May 2006 15:36
Intel Centrino Overclocking Guide jmke WebNews 0 31st January 2005 22:13
Intel prepares for next 20 years of chip making jmke WebNews 0 26th October 2004 09:33
Intel Outlines Strategy for Making the Internet Smarter, Safer, More Reliable Sidney WebNews 0 9th September 2004 17:38

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:05.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO