It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel’s first Nehalem mobo is X58 Intel’s first Nehalem mobo is X58
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  



Other Recent News
ATi's Vantage Hotfix
JavaOne News Roundup

Similar Stories
Intel Nehalem, Bloomfield has 8MB of cache
Intel reveals details of Nehalem, Larrabee, Dunnington
All Intel Nehalem CPUs not created equally
Two New Sockets For Intel Nehalem In 2008
Intel Blackford gets taped out, Nehalem re-emerges
  
Intel’s first Nehalem mobo is X58


 
Thread Tools
10th May 2008, 11:28 [jmke] - #1
Default Intel’s first Nehalem mobo is X58

Today we find out that the first Bloomfield supporting mobo will be Intel X58(with ICH10/R) coming out Q4 this year. Because Bloomfield have already got memory controller integrated, so north bridge will be simplified. The biggest point of the board will be the odd lay out, dual channel, Triple channel DD3 supporting and Dual PCIe 2.0 X16 or Quad PCIe 2.0 X8. (src: FireTech !)

http://en.expreview.com/2008/05/09/i...m-mobo-is-x58/
10th May 2008, 21:28 [Kougar] - #2
Default

Hm, so that is possibly X58? I wonder if it will keep the Skull 'n Bones at retail.

Photo of a production model dual LGA1366 socket Gigabyte 7TESN-RN server board below. Also apparently 1GHz A1 silicon Nehalem scores 3 minutes under SuperPi... better than 1.1GHz Coppermine, but worse than 1GHz Duron.

http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl...Den%26hs%3DvKV
10th May 2008, 22:41 [jmke] - #3
Default

if it uses mucho less wattage... why not
10th May 2008, 23:44 [Rutar] - #4
Default

yep, the NV CEO wasn't so wrong that most people don't need more CPU power, he just forgot that Intel is now working on delivering the same power at much lower power usage
11th May 2008, 01:28 [FireTech] - #5
Default

It's funny, they haven't even got P45 & X45 fully sorted and X58 is already due within 6mths or so to supersede them.

P965 has gone EOL and P35 is going EOL by years end....

The question is - how many $$s
11th May 2008, 09:10 [Kougar] - #6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FireTech View Post
It's funny, they haven't even got P45 & X45 fully sorted and X58 is already due within 6mths or so to supersede them.

P965 has gone EOL and P35 is going EOL by years end....

The question is - how many $$s
What would you expect... No chipset that currently exists or is about to launch could possibly support Nehalem.

Only reason the chip frequency was 1GHz was because it was very early A1 silicon, first spin stuff.
11th May 2008, 14:35 [FireTech] - #7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar View Post
What would you expect... No chipset that currently exists or is about to launch could possibly support Nehalem.
I fully understand Nehalem is a new architecture requiring new chipsets.

My point was that such is the speed of progress of chipset technology that before they can even get the 'current' generation fully functional (both P45 & X48 were delayed), they are set to be superseded within a matter of months.

I definitely wouldn't want to be a motherboard manufacturer
11th May 2008, 22:00 [Kougar] - #8
Default

P45, or "Eaglelake" was always scheduled to launch 2Q'08... not been delayed, yet.

As far as X48, was delayed for surplus stock of X38 to push still. In my humble opinion should never of had X48, but I've said that before in other threads.

P31, P35, X38, X48.... G31, G33, G35, G43, G45, and the list continues. Perhaps ya see why I was ranting about it a few months back, now?

Edit: Might even get worse with Nehalem... LGA1366 and LGA1160, two sockets... more excuse for extra chipsets. Or maybe not.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:15.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO