It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th December 2005, 00:43   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,989
jmke has disabled reputation
Intel's CSI to outperform AMD's Hypertransport

Intel has an answer for AMD's Hypertransport and thinks its technology stacks up pretty well. In fact, Intel is telling customers that it has AMD beat, starting in 2008.

Intel's CSI high-speed serial interconnect was first meant to appear in a Xeon chip code-named Whitefield. That processor, however, met an untimely death as Intel India mucked up the CSI implementation and forced Intel to rework its plans. As of last check, Intel will now introduce CSI in the Tukwila version of Itanium due out in 2008.

Our sources indicate that an inexperienced Indian staff and not the technology itself was to blame for the Whitefield CSI miss. Intel has been telling customers that CSI will deliver all of the benefits of Hypertransport. And it will be found on chips with integrated memory controllers, putting Intel back on par with AMD.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/12/intel_csi_low/
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2005, 02:22   #2
Member
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

AMD R/D staffs sleep for 1,000 days, Intel will be ahead of Intel?? Is this the assumption?
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2005, 12:19   #3
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

2008 o_O
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2005, 13:14   #4
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

enough time for AMD to tweak and tune their HT-bus .
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2005, 15:03   #5
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

so, the 2008 is not a typo?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2005, 16:27   #6
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rutar
so, the 2008 is not a typo?
Nope, unless Ashlee managed to make the same type 4 times .

Does anybody know how long it will take before it'll be used in normal non-Itanium desktop, or how long will we have to work whith the slow FSB while AMD is racing down the track w/ it's HT bus .
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD's 12-core "Magny-Cours" Opteron 6174 vs. Intel's 6-core Xeon jmke WebNews 0 29th March 2010 08:10
Intel's supply shortage is AMD's gain jmke WebNews 0 14th July 2009 11:23
AMD HyperTransport 3.1 Announced to help fend off Intel's Quick Path jmke WebNews 0 18th August 2008 23:29
A brief look at Intel's new Common Systems Interconnect (CSI) jmke WebNews 1 4th September 2007 18:58
Intel's answer to AMD Hypertransport will even up the odds jmke WebNews 0 28th August 2007 16:31
AMD's Live® to counter Intel's Viiv® Sidney WebNews 0 15th February 2006 04:25
Intel's Pentium M 760 versus AMD's Turion 64 ML-44 jmke WebNews 1 13th February 2006 20:07
In Chips, AMD's Shipments Zip; Intel's Slip jmke WebNews 0 10th May 2005 23:48
AMD's Athlon64 X2 trumps Intel's Pentium D Sidney WebNews 0 10th May 2005 07:32
Dual Core Wars: Intel's Dempsey set to knuckle AMD's Toledo jmke WebNews 0 17th August 2004 23:29

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:07.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO