It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel responds to NetCat bug Intel responds to NetCat bug
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel responds to NetCat bug
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th September 2019, 08:57   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 148,597
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Intel responds to NetCat bug

Not much to worry about

Intel has responded to the news that a bug, dubbed NetCat, can in specific scenarios abuse DDIO to obtain keystrokes and possibly other types of sensitive data that flow through the memory of vulnerable servers saying it is "low severity".

For those who came in late, the warning came from Dutch VUSec security boffins at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam but Intel tells us that the issue is low severity.

A spokesman said that Chipzilla received notice of this research and determined it to be low severity (CVSS score of 2.6) primarily due to complexity, user interaction, and the uncommon level of access that would be required in scenarios where DDIO and RDMA are typically used. Additional mitigations include the use of software modules resistant to timing attacks, using constant-time style code.

In scenarios where DDIO and RDMA are enabled, strong security controls on a secured network are required as an attacker would need to have Read and Write RDMA access on a target machine using DDIO. In the complex scenarios where DDIO and RDMA are typically used, such as massively parallel computing clusters, the access an attacker would need would be uncommon.

Additional mitigations include the use of existing software modules resistant to constant-time style attacks, previously published best practices and guidelines for side channel resistance, as well as guidance for mitigating timing side channels against cryptographic implementations.

https://fudzilla.com/news/49382-inte...-on-netcat-bug
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LG Responds to EC Decision on CRT Displays Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 6th December 2012 08:04
AMD Responds to Intel's Larrabee jmke WebNews 0 8th December 2009 09:20
Intel Responds to Fragmentation with New X25-M Firmware jmke WebNews 0 14th April 2009 11:05
Intel Responds to AMD, NVIDIA USB 3.0 Allegations jmke WebNews 5 14th August 2008 00:31
Intel responds to EU action jmke WebNews 0 18th July 2008 14:48
Intel responds to EU antitrust charges jmke WebNews 0 8th January 2008 15:16
Intel Responds to EU Charges jmke WebNews 0 28th July 2007 09:48
Intel Responds to AMD Quad FX System jmke WebNews 3 9th January 2007 15:00
MS Responds To HD-DVD Reports: Big fat no. jmke WebNews 0 16th December 2005 17:05
MSI responds to 6800GT problems jmke WebNews 1 4th February 2005 15:25

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO