Intel graphics drivers employ questionable 3DMark Vantage optimizations

jmke · 12th October 2009, 20:37

Intel may not be playing fair, though. We recently learned AMD has notified Futuremark that Intel's 15.15.4.1872 Graphics Media Accelerator drivers for Windows 7 incorporate performance optimizations that specifically target the benchmark, so we decided to investigate.

We first ran the benchmark normally. Then, we renamed the 3DMark executable from "3DMarkVantage.exe" to "3DMarkVintage.exe". And—wouldn't you know it?—there was a substantial performance difference between the two.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/17732

jmke · 12th October 2009, 20:40

Quote:

We have engineered intelligence into our 4 series graphics driver such that when a workload saturates graphics engine with pixel and vertex processing, the CPU can assist with DX10 geometry processing to enhance overall performance. 3DMarkVantage is one of those workloads, as are Call of Juarez, Crysis, Lost Planet: Extreme Conditions, and Company of Heroes. We have used similar techniques with DX9 in previous products and drivers. The benefit to users is optimized performance based on best use of the hardware available in the system. Our driver is currently in the certification process with Futuremark and we fully expect it will pass their certification as did our previous DX9 drivers.

If they want to increase FPS in games by shifting workload to CPU, fine! But don't inflate 3D benchmarks.

Kougar · 12th October 2009, 22:42

This is supposed to be a surprise?? Why else would they want to move the GPU into the CPU, unless the CPU was helping offload tasks.

Basic GPU overhead doesn't warrant it by itself.

12th October 2009, 20:37	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 82,497	Intel graphics drivers employ questionable 3DMark Vantage optimizations Intel may not be playing fair, though. We recently learned AMD has notified Futuremark that Intel's 15.15.4.1872 Graphics Media Accelerator drivers for Windows 7 incorporate performance optimizations that specifically target the benchmark, so we decided to investigate. We first ran the benchmark normally. Then, we renamed the 3DMark executable from "3DMarkVantage.exe" to "3DMarkVintage.exe". And—wouldn't you know it?—there was a substantial performance difference between the two. http://techreport.com/articles.x/17732 __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Clarkdale’s Second Half: Intel HD Graphics Review	jmke	WebNews	6	5th February 2010 10:44
NVIDIA Now Providing Notebook Graphics Drivers	jmke	WebNews	0	20th December 2008 15:27
Intel Releases Pre-Production Windows 7 Graphics Driver for Developers	jmke	WebNews	0	11th December 2008 03:08
Make it or Break It: HWbot to Support 3DMark Vantage?	jmke	WebNews	0	20th August 2008 09:39
Intel Bloomfield clock for clock 45% faster in 3DMark Vantage CPU Test	jmke	WebNews	6	4th June 2008 17:02
Intel to increase graphics performance by 10x	jmke	WebNews	1	17th October 2007 13:53
Intel ships long-awaited graphics drivers	Sidney	WebNews	1	19th August 2007 03:35
AMD Promises Open Source Graphics Drivers	jmke	WebNews	0	13th May 2007 21:47
NVIDIA Strikes PCI Express Graphics Cards Promotion Deal with Intel	jmke	WebNews	0	3rd December 2004 15:26
Intel Readies New Integrated Graphics Core With four times the horsepower	jmke	WebNews	0	29th March 2004 08:06

12th October 2009, 22:42	#3
Kougar Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,640	This is supposed to be a surprise?? Why else would they want to move the GPU into the CPU, unless the CPU was helping offload tasks. Basic GPU overhead doesn't warrant it by itself.