It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel G33 Performance Review Intel G33 Performance Review
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel G33 Performance Review
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28th September 2007, 10:36   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Intel G33 Performance Review

Considering the IGP market accounts for almost 90% of PC shipments, it's very apparent that boards in this sector must meet a wide variety of goals in order to be successful. If nothing else, they must be the jack of all trades but master of none. The Intel G33 chipset reminds us of that philosophy.

What we basically have in the G33 chipset is a P35 core with a GMA950+ IGP unit tacked on it. This means the G33 based boards will perform very well in a variety of tasks that do not rely on video processing power. While the video capabilities of the G33 will suffice for running Vista Aero, just about any office application, and a wide variety of non-3D based games, it is not up to the task of running the latest games, decoding HD content, or even providing decent video capabilities for a media station.

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3111&p=1
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2007, 23:20   #2
FireTech
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Save yourself the long read and go to Gary's conclusion:
Quote:
However, these boards don't exist in a vacuum -- there are many other uATX options out there. We really cannot recommend any of these boards for the user who needs a basic HTPC setup and does not want to spend more on the GPU than they spent on the board, processor, and potentially memory in some cases. In the Intel world, the AMD Radeon X1250 offers a significantly better feature set, as do the NVIDIA MCP73 based boards that we will see in our next article. These same video capabilities are also available in the AMD 690G and (to a certain extent) the NVIDIA 7050 boards for AMD. That sometimes is the issue with being a jack of all trades: you get left out in the cold when somebody needs a master tradesman for a specific job.
In other words, if you're an 'enthusiast', forget them and look elsewhere such as µATX part 3....
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i5-661 Clarksdale Processor Review jmke WebNews 0 17th February 2010 10:34
SSD Performance: Marvell SATA-6G vs Intel ICH10 jmke WebNews 0 7th December 2009 09:03
RIP Keith Suppe , Liquid3D jmke WebNews 16 7th September 2009 12:16
Review Roundup - Hours of Reading Fun jmke WebNews 0 10th March 2008 10:38
ASRock 4Core1333-Viiv and Intel E4400 Performance Review jmke Articles & Howto's 2 1st September 2007 14:07
[M] ASRock 4Core1333-Viiv and Intel E4400 Performance Review jmke WebNews 1 31st August 2007 13:45
ECS G33T-M2 (V1.0) Intel G33 mATX Motherboard Review jmke WebNews 0 21st August 2007 18:56
Intel Core 2 Performance, Overclocking, Power Usage Review jmke Articles & Howto's 13 21st July 2006 17:04
Intel Yonah Performance Preview - Part I: The Exclusive First Look at Yonah jmke WebNews 0 30th November 2005 15:49
Intel Pentium D 820 and Pentium 4 670 Review Sidney WebNews 0 31st May 2005 16:28

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO