It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel Details Haswell Overclocking at IDF Beijing Intel Details Haswell Overclocking at IDF Beijing
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Intel Details Haswell Overclocking at IDF Beijing
Thread Tools
Old 15th April 2013, 09:24   #1
[M] Reviewer
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 112,942
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Intel Details Haswell Overclocking at IDF Beijing

As we march towards the June 2nd release of Intel's Haswell processors, the company is slowly but surely filling in the missing blanks. Most recently we saw a shot of the often discussed but rarely seen Haswell GT3e part with on-package DRAM, and today we get some confirmation on what overclocking Haswell will be like.

As a quick refresher, the max clock frequency of Haswell is governed by the following equation:

Clock Speed = BCLK * Ratio

In the old days, both of the variables on the right hand side were unlocked (back then it wasn't called BCLK). Around the time of the Pentium II, Intel locked the multiplier ratios (rightmost variable) and then a few years ago we lost the ability to manipulate un-multiplied input frequency.

We can actually trace the recent struggles with BCLK overclocking back to the days of Lynnfield in 2009. Lynnfield featured Intel's first on-die PCIe controller, which wasn't fully decoupled from the rest of the CPU. We still had BCLK overclocking, but you needed to supply higher core voltages to the CPU to get there with any amount of stability. Nehalem, Lynnfield's predecessor, didn't have this issue.

With Sandy Bridge, we lost the ability to overclock using the BCLK altogether. Intel made good on this tradeoff by giving us a couple of K-series SKUs with unlocked multipliers, but it pretty much killed the market for buying low end Intel CPUs and overclocking them to deliver the performance of much higher end parts (sidenote: this is why we need AMD, ARM only pushes Intel to be more competitive on power at this point).

Ivy Bridge didn't really change things, but Sandy Bridge E did restore a bit of BCLK overclocking. You could select from a handful of predefined straps that enabled BCLK overclocking but without running the PCIe or QPI busses out of spec. With Haswell, we get something similar.
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel ships Haswell with USB bug Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 9th April 2013 07:31
Intel Haswell Socket H Heatsink Requirements and Overclocking Thoughts Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 3rd April 2013 10:03
USB 3.0 problems for Intel's Haswell Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 4th March 2013 09:45
BClk-based Overclocking Returns with Haswell? Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 14th January 2013 12:36
Intel ekes out more Haswell details Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 12th September 2012 09:27
A look into the future of Intel CPUs overclocking; Sandybridge, Ivybridge and Haswell Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 14th October 2011 09:32
MSI Master Overclocking Arena 2009 Grand Final in Beijing - Video Coverage jmke WebNews 0 6th September 2009 09:45
Intel 22nm Ivy Bridge and Haswell CPU Details jmke WebNews 0 12th August 2008 16:24
Intel talks 45nm chips, Larrabee at IDF Beijing jmke WebNews 0 17th April 2007 09:25
Intel D975XBX2 Motherboard Details and QX6700 Overclocking piotke WebNews 0 27th September 2006 18:35

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO