![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,497
![]() | We were surprised to see that the Bloomfield generation of CPUs will officially support DDR3 800 or 1066. Even the extreme edition 3.2GHz Core i7 officially only supports DDR3 1066 and not faster. There won't even be an official support for DDR3 1333 not to mention 1600 or faster. Bloomfield Nehalem doesn’t run with DDR2 memory as the memory controller is inside of a CPU and so far we are not aware of any plans to release Bloomfield Core i7 CPU that would support DDR2. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...14&Ite mid=34
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 41
![]() | "Fudzilla has already mentioned the fact that for some reason you need to run memory CPU voltage synchronously which might be an overclocker's worst nightmare. At this current stage you cannot go over 1.65V and some memories such as DDR3 1600 or DDR3 2000 might need a bit more than that. With more than 1.65 you will kill any current Nehalem CPU." Is this confirmed? If so, that's possibly the stupidest design decision I've heard of in a while. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,640
![]() | No, it was disproven. Intel also stated DDR3-1333MHz operation is confirmed for the Extreme chip. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 41
![]() | So the RAM + CPU don't share a voltage setting? Thank god. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,640
![]() | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |