| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,020
![]() | ![]() Take the Core i7, shave off one memory controller and replace the high bandwidth QPI link with Intel’s slower DMI and you’ve got the makings of a (more) mainstream Nehalem. Many have been calling this processor the Core i5 although I’m not quite ready to jump on that bandwagon, so I’ll keep referring to it by its socket (LGA-1156) or codename (Lynnfield). The new socket requires a new cooler. The four mounting holes are closer together on the LGA-1156 socket than they are on LGA-1366 boards, but further apart than LGA-775. It’s just different enough to require a brand new cooler, or at least a new mounting bracket. Instead of crippling graphics on its mainstream platform, Intel did the next best thing and integrated 16 PCIe 2.0 lanes onto the die of its mainstream Nehalem part. All of the processors are quad-core Nehalems with the same cache sizes as the Core i7. The only crippled beast is the entry level Lynnfield that has Hyper Threading disabled. The current rumors in the press are that Lynnfield is being held back in order to clear out excess Core 2 Quad inventory before it ships, because once this thing ships no one is going to want a Penryn anymore. Based on what I've seen, Lynnfield isn't ready just yet - it's not an artificial delay. The motherboards are in rough shape, CF/SLI isn't working and we're still at very early revs of the CPU's silicon. While I think that the chip will be ready far in advance of its rumored September shipdate, the CPU and motherboards aren't yet. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3570
__________________ ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #2 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,020
![]() | ![]() When I got to the last page and started reading the Why would anyone want a LGA-1366 system then? , I got a nasty flashback. S939 vs S754: we all knew S754 was a dead end, right from the start; why o why is Intel taking this same decisions? Build one platform, let it scale all the way up and down; why force people to upgrade motherboard to upgrade their CPU ![]()
__________________ ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #3 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() Should I be looking into buying an i7 920 D0 before September then? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | #4 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Depends on what you have now, if you own a Pentium 3 and photoshop crashes when you try to run it together with winamp I'd say it wouldn't be a bad idea to spend you money wisely now already ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel Core i5 750 and Core i7 860 CPU Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th January 2010 10:15 |
Intel Core i5-750 review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 22nd January 2010 11:35 |
Cooler Master V10 CPU Cooler on Intel Core i7 Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 22nd January 2010 11:32 |
Intel Core i7 960 versus 975 Extreme CPU Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th November 2009 10:25 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz 1333MHz FSB Processor Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 10th May 2009 14:52 |
Intel Core i7 920 and 965 XE CPU Review | jmke | Articles & Howto's | 3 | 3rd November 2008 22:56 |
Intel Core 2 Cache test: Seven CPUs review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th October 2008 14:08 |
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 4th September 2008 11:19 |
[M] Intel Core 2 Extreme CPU Cooler Review | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 2nd July 2008 13:50 |
Thread Tools | |
| |