Madshrimps Forum Madness

Madshrimps Forum Madness (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/)
-   WebNews (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/)
-   -   Intel Core i3 530 (2.93Ghz) vs AMD Athlon II X4 620 (2.6Ghz) Performance Benchmarks (https://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/f22/intel-core-i3-530-2-93ghz-vs-amd-athlon-ii-x4-620-2-6ghz-performance-benchmarks-68833/)

jmke 28th December 2009 14:55

Intel Core i3 530 (2.93Ghz) vs AMD Athlon II X4 620 (2.6Ghz) Performance Benchmarks
 
9 Attachment(s)

click the image to start slide-show of performance tests
But product can not patronize the performance, price is also very important reference factor. Since Core i3 530 will listing two weeks later and price is $123, while Athlon II X4 620 current market quotes is only $99, and that at a glance you can see whos cost performance is high. Athlon II X4 620 is not only the better choice now,After Core i3 530 launch, its cost/performance still is better
src: http://en.inpai.com.cn/doc/enshowcont.asp?id=7475

geoffrey 28th December 2009 20:06

4 real cores > 2real + 2ht cores, and AMD is cheaper.

jmke 28th December 2009 20:25

do check out the gaming benchies, which are in favor of raw CPU power of the Core i3, but still, the AMD is clocked 300Mhz lower and can keep up :)

I have to admit, Athlon II X4 really is quite a bargain and won't be outdated when Core i3 is released

geoffrey 28th December 2009 20:29

You don't need 4 cores most of the time, but what if they're cheaper... :)

leeghoofd 28th December 2009 22:00

These cpus could clock like mad

Massman 28th December 2009 22:31

like Madshrimps?

leeghoofd 28th December 2009 22:32

No Do Albrecht

Jaco 29th December 2009 10:59

Both cpu's at equal clockspeed would be more fair imo.

Why didn't they test the Athlon II X4 630


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:06.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO