It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel Conroe versus AMD AM2 benchmarked Intel Conroe versus AMD AM2 benchmarked
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel Conroe versus AMD AM2 benchmarked
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd May 2006, 10:27   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Intel Conroe versus AMD AM2 benchmarked

We first learned of Conroe's alleged performance when our Editor-In-Chief, David Ross, managed to gain access to a set of benchmarks that showed a 2.66GHz model soundly beating an overclocked AMD Athlon FX-60 in every test. But some of us took the staggeringly impressive results with a substantial pinch of salt. After all, they were produced in strict Intel-controlled conditions with who-knows-what optimisations present. If you've not done so already, you might want to take a peek here at those numbers.

What may also surprise you is that Intel already lists the unreleased Conroe on its web site, under the official branding of Core 2 Duo. The formal release is at least a month off but we, being an inquisitive and resourceful bunch of hacks, have managed to procure a couple of Conroe samples to test in our own (unbiased) lab.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 10:41   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Okay so these benchmarks show that in some cases the Conroe has a nice lead, but also that the A64 has nice lead in some other areas. And when it comes to gaming, the difference between the two is only noticeable at lower resolutions when the GPU is not the bottleneck, at high resolutions & detail there is no difference between the two. In applications it is a mixed bag, multimedia encoding works much better on A64, while some raytracing benchmark give better numbers on Conroe.

It's not really what I would call "dominating" or a "clear win".
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 12:19   #3
Ranzy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Conroe clearly dominates here, of course it won't shine as much when the GPU is the bottleneck, that's normal, but that's not how you benchmark a processor. When you take a look at the Far Cry result it's clear how much better the Conroe performs.
As much as I love AMD, to me it's clear that Conroe is the better processor here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 12:26   #4
Member
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

yes, but as a lot of us are gamers, it's no use skipping out any of the cpus we have for each one of these, since in current high res gaming there will be NO advantage whatsoever when you have good gpu's...
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 12:28   #5
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

the voice of reason !
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 17:56   #6
Ranzy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Senile Doctor
yes, but as a lot of us are gamers, it's no use skipping out any of the cpus we have for each one of these, since in current high res gaming there will be NO advantage whatsoever when you have good gpu's...
True of course, but that doesn't change the fact that the Conroe clearly wins over AMD's Athlon FX and that it is the better choice for those gamers in need of an upgrade.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 17:59   #7
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

gamers with S754/S939 shouldn't worry about upgrading their systems, not this year at least, maybe the next; there is not game/software app which requires a super expensive CPU to run quickly and keep the PC usuable; most people still use P4 (S478) and Athlon XP; the masses are always a few generations behind
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 19:51   #8
Member
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

and any one of those using a 3ghz + p4 or a 2.2 ghz+ amd should upgrade their gpu's be4 anything else
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 20:48   #9
Ranzy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah okay guys, but you can't deny it: Conroe whoops A64's butt here, much like A64 whooped P4's butt not so long ago. And I know the cpu isn't that important these days for games, and it's been that way the past year or two, but I also know that this Conroe is gonna sell like hot cakes when it comes out...
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd May 2006, 20:51   #10
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

problem is that Intel won't be able to make enough hot cakes to sell to all; so what happens when a product is limited in quantity and demand is high?
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server roundup: Intel "Nehalem" Xeon versus AMD "Shanghai" Opteron jmke WebNews 0 4th May 2009 16:52
Leaked - AMD Barcelona versus Intel Clovertown and Tigerton jmke WebNews 0 9th September 2007 15:51
Intel V8 versus AMD 4X4 Platform jmke WebNews 0 31st August 2007 12:49
Intel Core 2 Duo Vs. AMD AM2 jmke WebNews 0 13th September 2006 12:19
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Performance Tested versus AMD S939/AM2 and Intel P4 jmke WebNews 3 21st June 2006 23:09
Conroe E6700 @ 2.4Ghz beats AMD AM2 FX-62 @ 3Ghz jmke WebNews 2 1st June 2006 10:46
Will next-gen AMD beat the Intel Conroe? jmke WebNews 0 14th March 2006 00:20
Intel Conroe 2.67Ghz is 15-40% faster than AMD FX-60 2.8Ghz - Benchmarked! jmke WebNews 8 8th March 2006 13:02
Intel claims that upcoming Conroe and Merom Chips deliver 20% speed boost over AMD jmke WebNews 0 18th February 2006 16:28
Half-Life 2 CPU Shootout: AMD versus Intel jmke WebNews 0 22nd November 2004 08:05

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:08.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO