It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel Celeron D CPU: Budget Processors from Intel Acquire Prescott Core Intel Celeron D CPU: Budget Processors from Intel Acquire Prescott Core
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel Celeron D CPU: Budget Processors from Intel Acquire Prescott Core
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 26th June 2004, 05:36   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default Intel Celeron D CPU: Budget Processors from Intel Acquire Prescott Core

The transition of Intel’s budget processors to the new 90nm Prescott core is a very important event for the CPU market. New Celeron D CPUs acquired larger L2 cache, SSE3 instructions support and faster 533MHz bus. Will these innovations be enough to turn the ugly duckling into a beautiful swan? Check out our review of the new Celeron D, including detailed performance tests and overclocking experiments!

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...celeron-d.html
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2004, 05:44   #2
[M] Reviewer
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

nice overclocking beasts, they're better cpu's than they were but they can't beat a 3.2 prescott at 3.8 :still not good enough...
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2004, 11:05   #3
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,578
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

allow me to see.. mahahahah

at 3.8ghz they are barely faster then a P4 2.8 "C"








I'm staying away from this dud
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2004, 16:41   #4
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

>>at 3.8ghz they are barely faster then a P4 2.8 "C"<<

At half of the price or less may not be as bad. Still runs hot.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i7 980X Extreme Edition CPU jmke WebNews 0 10th May 2010 14:58
Intel Core i7 980X Gulftown CPU Review jmke WebNews 0 22nd March 2010 16:26
Intel Core i5 750 and Core i7 860 CPU Review jmke WebNews 0 27th January 2010 09:15
Intel to launch a 32nm Core i9 CPU in September? jmke WebNews 3 17th August 2009 16:38
Intel Core i7 “Lynnfield” Processors Due on September 6 jmke WebNews 0 31st July 2009 13:42
GTA 4 (PC): Intel Core i7 far ahead of Core 2 Quad in CPU benchmarks jmke WebNews 2 7th January 2009 20:53
Intel Core i7 CPU and Platform Value jmke WebNews 0 16th November 2008 22:47
Intel Core 2 Duo E2160 vs E6300: Budget CPU Comparison jmke Articles & Howto's 10 20th August 2007 22:09
Core 2 Duo is 50 per cent of all Intel CPU shipments jmke WebNews 0 18th July 2007 11:19
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 CPU Quad Core jmke WebNews 0 22nd January 2007 21:45

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO