Intel Celeron 420/430/440: New Low-End Vs. Old Middle-End

Sidney · 20th November 2007, 02:23

We have not yet touched on the new Celeron based on Conroe-L core in any of our articles, although the subject has already become ripe for discussion. In this article the above-said shortcoming is going to be corrected. We shall acquaint you with performance characteristics of the new low-end Celeron models.

http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/...440-page1.html

jmke · 20th November 2007, 08:38

S939 doing pretty darn good, but that E2140 can be overclocked to surpass all others in the benchmark, without much effort

21st November 2007, 19:37

X2 3800 would seem to be, except the graphs were normalized so that "100" would be the performance of a Core 2 Duo E4300. Looks like a E4300 is the better of a X2 3800...

Very nice results, and very nice that they offered the original data file for DL.

jmke · 21st November 2007, 21:56

there's no doubt the E4300 is better

but it's more expensive than E2140

20th November 2007, 02:23	#1
Sidney Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,738	Intel Celeron 420/430/440: New Low-End Vs. Old Middle-End We have not yet touched on the new Celeron based on Conroe-L core in any of our articles, although the subject has already become ripe for discussion. In this article the above-said shortcoming is going to be corrected. We shall acquaint you with performance characteristics of the new low-end Celeron models. http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/...440-page1.html __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

20th November 2007, 08:38	#2
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	S939 doing pretty darn good, but that E2140 can be overclocked to surpass all others in the benchmark, without much effort __________________

21st November 2007, 21:56	#4
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	there's no doubt the E4300 is better but it's more expensive than E2140 __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Celeron lives on, Intel E3000 coming Q3 2009	jmke	WebNews	0	9th June 2009 14:00
Intel to adjust CPU pricing on low end P4/PD	jmke	WebNews	0	28th February 2007 14:49
Intel Adds Low End Xeons to Roadmap	jmke	WebNews	0	19th July 2006 12:58
Intel Set to Boost Performance of Celeron D Chips	jmke	WebNews	0	15th May 2006 23:24
Intel Introduces 64-bit Celeron D Chips	jmke	WebNews	0	27th June 2005 21:31
Intel Pushes Intel Pentium M, Intel Celeron M to Servers.	jmke	WebNews	0	14th June 2005 17:27
Intel releases low power Pentium Ms, Celeron Ms	jmke	WebNews	1	22nd July 2004 18:49
Intel Celeron D: New, Improved & Exceeds Expectations	jmke	WebNews	4	25th June 2004 01:51
Intel Celeron “Prescott” Processors to Get New Branding	jmke	WebNews	2	18th April 2004 17:34
Intel Expands Centrino Processor Options - Intel Corp. Debuts New Pentium M, Celeron	jmke	WebNews	0	8th April 2004 10:17

21st November 2007, 19:37	#3
Kougar Posts: n/a	X2 3800 would seem to be, except the graphs were normalized so that "100" would be the performance of a Core 2 Duo E4300. Looks like a E4300 is the better of a X2 3800... Very nice results, and very nice that they offered the original data file for DL.