Intel in bad place due to its integration model

Stefan Mileschin · 28th June 2018, 18:40

Tech analyst warns that integration is Intel's albatross

Tech analyst Ben Thompson, writing for Stratechery has warned that Intel's insistence on x86 integration is causing huge problems for the chip maker.

He said that the decline in PC chips left Intel more reliant on the sale of high-end chips to data centres because it had zero presence in mobile, the industry's other major growth area.

While 7nm for TSMC (or Samsung or Global Foundries) isn't necessarily better than Intel's 10nm, Chipzilla's process isn't close to shipping in volume, and the competition's 7nm processes are. Intel is behind, and its insistence on integration bears a large part of the blame.

Integration was probably responsible for Chipzilla's mobile miss too. The company presumed it could win by leveraging its manufacturing to create a more efficient x86 chip. Thompson said that this decision revealed too much knowledge of Intel's margins and not nearly enough reflection on the importance of the integration between DOS/Windows and x86.

Intel took the same mistaken approach to non-general purpose processors, mainly graphics: the company's Larrabee architecture was a graphics chip based on x86. It was predicated on leveraging Intel's integration, instead of meeting a market need. Once the project failed, Intel limped along with graphics that were barely passable for general purpose displays, and worthless for all of the new use cases that were emerging.

He said that Chipzilla's latest crisis, though, is in design: AMD is genuinely innovating with its Ryzen processors - manufactured by both GlobalFoundries and TSMC -while Intel is still selling variations on Skylake, a three year old design.

https://fudzilla.com/news/pc-hardwar...egration-model

28th June 2018, 18:40	#1
Stefan Mileschin [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2010 Location: Romania Posts: 148,440	Intel in bad place due to its integration model Tech analyst warns that integration is Intel's albatross Tech analyst Ben Thompson, writing for Stratechery has warned that Intel's insistence on x86 integration is causing huge problems for the chip maker. He said that the decline in PC chips left Intel more reliant on the sale of high-end chips to data centres because it had zero presence in mobile, the industry's other major growth area. While 7nm for TSMC (or Samsung or Global Foundries) isn't necessarily better than Intel's 10nm, Chipzilla's process isn't close to shipping in volume, and the competition's 7nm processes are. Intel is behind, and its insistence on integration bears a large part of the blame. Integration was probably responsible for Chipzilla's mobile miss too. The company presumed it could win by leveraging its manufacturing to create a more efficient x86 chip. Thompson said that this decision revealed too much knowledge of Intel's margins and not nearly enough reflection on the importance of the integration between DOS/Windows and x86. Intel took the same mistaken approach to non-general purpose processors, mainly graphics: the company's Larrabee architecture was a graphics chip based on x86. It was predicated on leveraging Intel's integration, instead of meeting a market need. Once the project failed, Intel limped along with graphics that were barely passable for general purpose displays, and worthless for all of the new use cases that were emerging. He said that Chipzilla's latest crisis, though, is in design: AMD is genuinely innovating with its Ryzen processors - manufactured by both GlobalFoundries and TSMC -while Intel is still selling variations on Skylake, a three year old design. https://fudzilla.com/news/pc-hardwar...egration-model

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Intel Leaks Model Numbers of Entry Level Xeon E-2000 CPUs	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	31st May 2018 06:21
Intel abandons its PC model	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	27th April 2018 14:45
Intel retires “tick-tock” development model, extending the life of each process	jmke	WebNews	0	30th March 2016 15:55
Intel Solid-State Drive 335 Series Adds 80GB Model	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	25th April 2013 07:57
Intel SSD 335 Series Expanded with New 180 GB Model	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	4th February 2013 08:40
SGI Continues Exascale Move with Integration of Intel Xeon Processor E5-2600 Family	Stefan Mileschin	WebNews	0	7th March 2012 06:35
Intel's first Z68 board model names leaked	jmke	WebNews	0	23rd February 2011 09:29
Intel's first 32nm Xeon CPUs Model Numbers Revealed	jmke	WebNews	0	15th December 2009 13:51
Intel Harpertown Model Number and Clock Speeds Unveiled	jmke	WebNews	0	16th July 2007 13:29
Intel’s 965 Chipsets to Support Shader Model 3.0	jmke	WebNews	0	24th February 2006 14:08