 |  |  |  |  |
Intel 925XE chipset and 3.46GHz Extreme Edition CPU
| |||||||||
|
Intel 925XE chipset and 3.46GHz Extreme Edition CPU
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
1st November 2004, 03:45
| #1 |
| Member  Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
 |  Intel 925XE chipset and 3.46GHz Extreme Edition CPU AMD has moved on but Intel's top-level performance has remained largely the same, so whilst I'm a fan of all the good aspects of 925X/XE chipsets, I find it hard to recommend it as a performance platform when the Extreme Edition is still playing catchup, most notably in gaming. Cast aside any company-specific favouritisms and ask yourself objectively what you would rather have if money was not an issue - an AMD FX-55/nForce4/DDR1 2-2-2-5 memory setup or 3.46GHz Extreme Edition/i925XE/DDR2? Link: http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews...lld19JRD04OTg=
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
|  |
|
1st November 2004, 09:56
| #2 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| no extra power for gaming. yeah. so that means my assumption on a 3ghz a64 lasting till mid of next year will be quite correct 
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
1st November 2004, 14:49
| #3 | |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Quote:
Glad the statement supports my theory on W/C ...... for quiet computing go W/C, but remember to install some devices to increase air movement ....... hahaha ..... when the tree sounds the wind blows. Sound = noise = opposite of QUIET.  Theory 2 When a processor is willing .... high vcore is unnecessary.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II | |
|
| |
|
1st November 2004, 21:42
| #4 |
|
Posts: n/a
| this cpu is not intended for people who want a "quiet" system |
| |
|
1st November 2004, 21:51
| #5 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| No high performance CPU is intended for Quiet System; otherwise, there will be no heatsink reviews in the last four years.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
|
| |
|
1st November 2004, 22:10
| #6 |
|
Posts: n/a
| oh I don't know about that, I can see jmke still doing heatsink roundups trying to find the quitest cooling fan+sink combo at acceptable speeds |
| |
|
1st November 2004, 23:05
| #7 | ||
| Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II | ||
|
| |
|
2nd November 2004, 00:13
| #8 |
|
Posts: n/a
| off course, if you don't take the context in account ... |
| |
|
2nd November 2004, 00:16
| #9 |
|
Posts: n/a
| ah darn, I meant to say at acceptable temperature earlier on :grum: |
| |
|
2nd November 2004, 00:17
| #10 |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Where did you read the New P4 processor and chipset is not intended for quiet system to begin with? You are making a statement base on your feeling and assumption rather than facts. Intel and AMD have never planned on making ANY processor for quiet computing. The low power processors are aimed at notebook; low power = longer battery life. The by-product becomes low heat output. Never do they plan on making processor for overclocking; it is the result of improved production yield.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
