It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Instagram backtracks on stealing Facebook photos Instagram backtracks on stealing Facebook photos
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Instagram backtracks on stealing Facebook photos
Thread Tools
Old 20th December 2012, 10:00   #1
[M] Reviewer
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 111,834
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Instagram backtracks on stealing Facebook photos

Instagram has back-tracked on a move which would have made the great train robbery look fairly tame.The photo-sharing service, which is now owned by Facebook, had a cunning plan to use Facebook's terms and conditions to steal snaps posted by users and flog them for its own fun and profit.

This means that pictures taken by ordinary people and posted for their friends to see could suddenly find themselves in mainstream advertising campaigns. That last snap you took of your mother before she croaked could end up advertising anal gel and to make matters worse you would not get a penny.
Needless to say there was a growing public outcry about the move which was covered as part of Facebook's new privacy policies.
Some Facebook users were considering deleting their snaps and abandoning the site. Their argument is that they do not put their pictures up so that they can be used by Instagram. However the privacy policy was worded in such a way that it would make it difficult for users to take any class actions, at least in the US.
According to The Daily Telegraph, Instagram insisted that it has "no plans" to incorporate user photos into ads.
Writing from his bog, Chief Executive Kevin Systrom said that users had incorrectly interpreted Instagram's revised terms of service. He said that user photos would not be sold to others without compensation."It is not our intention to sell your photos," Systrom said. "We are working on updated language in the terms to make sure this is clear."
Instagram did confirm that it may display users' profile pictures and information about who it follows as part of an ad. This is a social marketing technique similar to what Facebook uses in its "sponsored stories" ad product.
But the company will not incorporate users' uploaded photos as ads because the service wants "to avoid things like advertising banners."
Facebook bought the fast-growing photo service in a cash-and-stock deal valued initially at $1 billion.
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Facebook privacy overhaul grants better controls for permissions, apps, photos, more Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 13th December 2012 08:38
Facebook completes acquisition of Instagram, eyes improved mobile experience Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 7th September 2012 08:26
Facebook starts really, truly deleting removed photos Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 17th August 2012 09:13
Facebook Rolls Out "A More Beautiful View of Photos" Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 31st July 2012 08:27
Facebook snaps up mobile photo sharing firm Lightbox, decides Instagram isn't enough Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 16th May 2012 08:33
Facebook redesigns mobile site and apps, takes a tip (or two) from Instagram Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 15th May 2012 08:03
Facebook Flaw Lets You View Someone's Private Photos Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 7th December 2011 07:55
How to Download Your Photos and Videos from Facebook jmke WebNews 0 10th October 2010 21:22
Sony Backtracks on PS3 Upscaler Resolutions jmke WebNews 0 27th November 2006 10:05

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO