| ||Thread Tools|
|3rd May 2010, 11:58||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
The Impact of Spare Area on SandForce, More Capacity At No Performance Loss?
Instead of around 28% of the driveís NAND set aside as spare area, this version of the Agility 2 has 13%. You get more capacity to store data, at the expense of potentially lower performance. How much lower? Thatís exactly what Iíve spent the past several days trying to find out.
The drive looks just like a standard Agility 2. OCZ often makes special runs of drives for testing with no official labels or markings, in fact that's what my first SandForce drive came as late last year. Internally the drive looks identical to the Agility 2 we reviewed not too long ago.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|SandForce SF-1200: Does Lower Capacity Mean Lower Performance?||jmke||WebNews||0||30th June 2010 13:47|
|SandForce SF1200 RAID-0 SSD Performance||jmke||WebNews||0||4th May 2010 11:56|
|Factory HDD Capacity Loss - Fixing a 1TeraByte hard drives that show up as 32MB||jmke||WebNews||0||2nd September 2009 13:53|
|3D Vision for GeForce Benchmark Performance Impact||jmke||WebNews||1||13th January 2009 20:56|
|Exploring the impact of memory speed on Core i7 performance||jmke||WebNews||0||2nd December 2008 11:24|
|Corsair Announces Immediate Adoption of Enhanced Performance Profiles (EPP)||jmke||WebNews||1||16th May 2006 00:08|
|Exploring the performance impact of memory latency||jmke||WebNews||2||1st November 2005 17:44|
|Exploring the performance impact of memory latency||Sidney||WebNews||1||1st November 2005 16:00|
|Performance Impact on Changing Memory Size from 1GByte to 2 GByte||Sidney||WebNews||4||30th August 2005 21:45|
|Latency Settings and their Impact on Memory Performance||jmke||WebNews||1||29th March 2005 20:29|