It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
ImDisk Creates Dynamically Resizing RAM Disks ImDisk Creates Dynamically Resizing RAM Disks
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


ImDisk Creates Dynamically Resizing RAM Disks
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28th January 2014, 08:19   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default ImDisk Creates Dynamically Resizing RAM Disks

We've previously looked at reasons why you might want to create a RAM disk to boost your PCs performance. ImDisk can accomplish this same task without using up more RAM than necessary.

Under normal circumstances, a RAM disk will allocate an amount of RAM you specify to go to the virtual drive you've created. That RAM would no longer be available to the rest of your system. With ImDisk, you can create a virtual drive of a specific size, but only the amount of space that you actually use will ever be allocated. If you create a 2GB RAM disk, but only use up 100MB of space on it, the rest will still be available to your system until you fill it.

http://lifehacker.com/imdisk-creates...sks-1509758781
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2014, 08:45   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Let's see how it stacks up ( 12 Software RAM Disk Solutions - Up To 2358/1539Mb/s R/W Speeds )

Machine: Lenovo T530 with Quad Core CPU and 8GB RAM

Current champ is:
RAMDisk Software: http://www.softperfect.com/products/ramdisk/
Seq= Read: 6392 Mb/s - Write: 5433 Mb/s
512K= R: 6979 - W: 6848
4K= R: 1163 - W: 912
4K QD32= R: 1134 - W: 873.3


ImDisk Software: http://reboot.pro/files/file/284-imdisk-toolkit/
Seq= Read: 1640 Mb/s - Write: 1879 Mb/s
512K= R: 1643 - W: 1923
4K= R: 376.8 - W: 336.1
4K QD32= R: 744.7 - W: 592.9



nice thing about ImDisk is that it only uses the memory that's actually occupied in the ramdisk. But as you can see, performance wise it stands no chance. 4 times slower with large seq files; 3 times slower with small 4k files. Stick with the former if performance is what you're after!
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gmail 4.2.1 for Android adds easier resizing, swipe features and more Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 4th December 2012 07:29
Hitachi paves the way to 24TB disks jmke WebNews 0 26th November 2010 22:19
SSD versus Enterprise SAS and SATA disks jmke WebNews 0 20th March 2009 08:38
512GB Solid State Disks on the Way jmke WebNews 0 29th October 2007 09:36
Hard disks now encrypt themselves jmke WebNews 0 31st October 2006 07:36
Hybrid Hard Disks and Beyond jmke WebNews 0 15th December 2005 19:27
125GB platters appear in hard disks jmke WebNews 0 20th November 2005 22:14
Blu-Ray optical disks to be made from corn jmke WebNews 0 3rd November 2004 12:26
5400rpm disks for storage? RichBa5tard General Madness - System Building Advice 4 12th January 2004 19:59

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:05.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO