It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Google allowed to appeal books decision Google allowed to appeal books decision
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Google allowed to appeal books decision
Thread Tools
Old 16th August 2012, 08:38   #1
[M] Reviewer
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 122,892
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Google allowed to appeal books decision

Google can appeal the granting of class status to authors suing the search engine company over its plan to create the world's largest digital books library.

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York granted Google permission to challenge a 31 May decision by Circuit Judge Denny Chin letting authors sue as a group.

If Google wins it could save the search engine billions of dollars and force the Authors Guild, a group representing authors, to fight each case one at a time.

Google has already scanned more than 20 million books, and the Guild has said Google should pay $750 for each book copied.

Chin said it would be unfair to force Authors Guild members to sue individually. It would mean that there would be different results and much higher legal costs. What alarmed Google however was that he also added the phrase "given the sweeping and undiscriminating nature of Google's unauthorised copying" which probably means it is toast if it ever comes to a ruling.

Google told the Appeals court that case-by-case determinations were needed to show whether it was making "fair use" of the plaintiffs' works.

It said that "fair use" would be its main defence and Google should not be forced to litigate without the full benefit of its principal defence.

According to Reuters Google began creating the library after the company agreed in 2004 with several major research libraries to digitise current and out-of-print works.

Harvard University, Oxford University, Stanford University, the University of California, the University of Michigan and the New York Public Library have all had their collections scanned.

In March last year Chin rejected a $125 million settlement of the case, saying it gave Google a "de facto monopoly" to copy books en masse without permission.
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Facebook allowed to triple size of its HQ, pays $10 million for the privilege Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 31st May 2012 08:43
How to download books from Google jmke WebNews 1 10th September 2009 10:24
Futuremark: NVIDIA GPU PhysX not allowed jmke WebNews 0 21st July 2008 10:42
PSU Decision Making Basics jmke WebNews 1 10th April 2006 17:30
The Dual Core CPU Decision Sidney WebNews 0 19th February 2006 06:14
Google: China decision painful but right Sidney WebNews 0 26th January 2006 19:36
No pre-owned games to be allowed for Playstation 3 Sidney WebNews 1 9th November 2005 16:52

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:31.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO