| ||Thread Tools|
|28th October 2008, 17:09||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
Filtering failure: Belgian ISP gets reprieve from court
Belgian Internet Service Provider Scarlet won a small victory in the ongoing legal battle between the ISP and Belgian copyright holders representative SABAM. Scarlet will not have to pay €750,000 in penalties for failure to comply with a court order to implement peer-to-peer filtering of copyrighted material.
SABAM fullfills a role similar to the Harry Fox Agency in the US by collecting licensing fees on behalf of copyright holders of all kinds in Belgium. In 2004, the group filed a suit against Scarlet (known as Tiscali at the time), demanding that the ISP implement technical measures to make sure that its customers wouldn't share materials infringing on the copyrights of SABAM members through peer-to-peer networks.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|No Court Order Needed to Spy on Americans Overseas||Shogun||WebNews||0||29th November 2008 20:42|
|Belgian ISP must filter P2P music; files appeal||jmke||WebNews||0||24th July 2007 09:47|
|Danish court tells ISP to block access to AllofMP3.com||jmke||WebNews||0||27th October 2006 11:26|
|ATI texture filtering quality? Shimmer this!||Sidney||WebNews||0||12th September 2005 16:48|
|ECTS Feature: The Filtering War Will Be No More?||jmke||WebNews||0||2nd September 2004 12:33|
|AMD defeats Intel in US Supreme Court||jmke||WebNews||1||22nd June 2004 18:59|
|AMD, Intel to meet in court — again||jmke||WebNews||0||20th April 2004 11:51|