Energy consumption of current processors @ ComputerBase.de

jmke · 23rd May 2004, 01:59

Quote:

So far we always judged processors on the basis their efficiency; the current consumption boliden was ignored always perfectly thereby. We entered around other time with, the maximum thermal energy dissipations indicated by the manufacturer - thus the heat energy, which a radiator must exhaust in extreme cases. But thereby in each case a part of the truth was presented. Armed with an energy measuring instrument of the company Voltcraft (Energy check 3000) now the question is to be finally clarified on the following pages, which of the Highend processors by a „ausgeglichenen Energiehaushalt” to convince know.

the Athlon 64 scores pretty good, the Prescott on the other hand...
http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl...h_prozessoren/

Sidney · 23rd May 2004, 05:35

Now you know.; )

23rd May 2004, 08:45

That's one of the best articles I read in quite some time. Nobody ever thouches that surface.

So AMD is even cheaper after usage too.

wutske · 23rd May 2004, 09:41

Interesting

.
Found a nice calc for OC'ed CPU's calc

23rd May 2004, 12:09

folding on a prescott is nuts
constantly 250 watts :wtf:

Sidney · 23rd May 2004, 12:17

Without the total understanding in language used, I believe the numbers are bigger than what they appear to be. Unless, there is 100% leakage in every CPU. Heat dissipation is from loss.

23rd May 2004, 05:35	#2
Sidney [M] Reviewer Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 16,730	Now you know.; ) __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

23rd May 2004, 12:17	#6
Sidney [M] Reviewer Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 16,730	Without the total understanding in language used, I believe the numbers are bigger than what they appear to be. Unless, there is 100% leakage in every CPU. Heat dissipation is from loss. __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Dell Now Offering Five Server Platforms Based on Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ Processors	jmke	WebNews	0	16th April 2008 08:06
AMD Launches World’s First x86 Triple-Core Processors	jmke	WebNews	0	27th March 2008 15:16
High Performance AMD Phenom™ X4 Processors Lead the Charge to HD Desktop Gaming and V	jmke	WebNews	0	27th March 2008 15:09
AMD Energy Efficient Processors: 4600+ and 3800+	jmke	WebNews	0	13th September 2006 12:04
AMD Energy Efficient Processors Reach Retail	jmke	WebNews	0	7th July 2006 08:34
Intel Unveils Mobile Processors with 5.5W Power Consumption	jmke	WebNews	3	19th April 2006 19:34
AMD Introduces Three New Dual-Core AMD Opteron™ Processors	jmke	WebNews	0	12th March 2006 19:25
ATI Employs Mobile Technologies to Reduce Desktop GPU Power Consumption	jmke	WebNews	0	3rd February 2006 23:29
Intel Delivers Next-Generation Processors for Embedded Market Segments	Sidney	WebNews	0	2nd June 2004 05:01
Intel to Divide Processors By Power Consumption	jmke	WebNews	0	6th May 2004 09:04

23rd May 2004, 08:45	#3
Sarcastro Posts: n/a	That's one of the best articles I read in quite some time. Nobody ever thouches that surface. So AMD is even cheaper after usage too.

23rd May 2004, 09:41	#4
wutske Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Apenland Posts: 2,069	Interesting . Found a nice calc for OC'ed CPU's calc

23rd May 2004, 12:09	#5
jakkerd Posts: n/a	folding on a prescott is nuts constantly 250 watts :wtf: