It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Core i5-3570K Graphics 67% Faster Than Core i5-2500K, 36% Slower Than GeForce GT 240 Core i5-3570K Graphics 67% Faster Than Core i5-2500K, 36% Slower Than GeForce GT 240
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Core i5-3570K Graphics 67% Faster Than Core i5-2500K, 36% Slower Than GeForce GT 240
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st February 2012, 06:53   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 44,731
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Core i5-3570K Graphics 67% Faster Than Core i5-2500K, 36% Slower Than GeForce GT 240

An Expreview community member ran benchmarks comparing the performance of the Intel HD 4000 graphics embedded into its upcoming 22 nm "Ivy Bridge" Core i5-3570K, comparing it to the integrated graphics of Core i5-2500K, and discrete graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 240. These tests are endorsed by the site. The suite of benchmarks included games that aren't quite known to be very taxing on graphics hardware by today's standards, yet are extremely popular; games such as StarCraft II, Left4Dead 2, DiRT 3, Street Fighter IV. Some of the slightly more graphics-intensive benchmarks included Far Cry 2 and 3DMark Vantage. All benchmarks were run at 1280 x 720 resolution.

The Intel HD 4000 graphics core beats the HD 3000 hands down, with performance leads as high as 122% in a particular test. The chip produces more than playable frame-rates with Left4Dead 2 and Street Fighter IV, both well above 50 FPS, even DiRT 3 and Far Cry 2 run strictly OK, over 30 FPS. StarCraft II is where it produced under 30 FPS, so the chip might get bogged down in intense battles. A mainstream discrete GeForce or Radeon is a must. On average, the graphics core embedded into the Core i5-3570K was found to be 67.25% faster than the one on the Core i5-2500K.

http://www.techpowerup.com/160895/Co...ce-GT-240.html
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Core i7-3960X About 47% Faster On Average Than Core i7-990X: Intel jmke WebNews 0 22nd July 2011 14:46
Intel Sandy Bridge High C/P Combo - Core i5-2500K with GIGABYTE P67A-UD3R OC Guide windwithme Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding 6 21st March 2011 12:36
Intel Core i5-2500K Processor Review jmke WebNews 0 16th February 2011 10:48
Intel Core i5 2500K Sandy Bridge CPU jmke WebNews 0 27th January 2011 14:09
Intel Core i5-2500K LGA 1155 “Sandy Bridge” Processor Review jmke WebNews 0 26th January 2011 14:28
Intel (SandyBridge) Core i5 2500K vs Core i5 760. 4 Cores no HT jmke WebNews 0 13th December 2010 10:33
Intel: Core i7 to Be Up to 52% Faster Compared to Core 2 Quad. jmke WebNews 0 10th October 2008 17:30
site slower or faster ? tom Site & Forum Feedback - Folding@Home 78 8th February 2007 09:43
Add Another Core for Faster Graphics jmke WebNews 0 29th August 2006 15:21
Intel dual core may play games slower jmke WebNews 0 18th March 2005 12:02

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO