 |  |  |  |  |
Catalyst 4.6 Performance Comparsion
| |||||||||
|
Catalyst 4.6 Performance Comparsion
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
13th June 2004, 00:46
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,420
 |  Catalyst 4.6 Performance Comparsion Dark-Tweaker have thrown up their benchies for ATi's latest Catalyst 4.6 Drivers plus a performance comparsion againist Catalyst 4,5, and 3 beta drivers. Please Note the sites in German but the benchmarks, as always, talk a universal language. Catalyst 4.6 win-xp-2k-614106451 radeon802 ati_040420a2-015166E-x800 8.001-04032á-014965C (from CD) http://216.239.39.104/translate_c?hl...language_tools
__________________  |
|  |
|
13th June 2004, 06:59
| #2 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
 | it is not universal, it is global, for all we know, martians could see those graphs as a deaththreat. The truth is out there. Be very, very paranoid
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
13th June 2004, 07:26
| #3 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
| Catalyst update/release has become releasing eggs (monthly period).
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
|
| |
|
13th June 2004, 10:40
| #4 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,420
| that's been going on for more then 1.5 years now 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
13th June 2004, 16:59
| #5 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
| That's why I'm bitching! 
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
|
| |
|
13th June 2004, 17:01
| #6 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,420
| bitching because they strive to remove all the bugs from their drivers?
__________________ |
|
| |
|
13th June 2004, 17:16
| #7 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
| Monthly debugging; or continuous improvement, if they can't see three / six months ahead, something is not right. I would hate to see a manufacturing software gets an update on a monthly bases; or any software. It tells me they don't have their head put together right.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
|
| |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATI Catalyst 10.2 Windows 7 Performance Evaluation | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 19th February 2010 10:06 |
| ATI Catalyst 9.8 Performance Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th August 2009 15:18 |
| ATI Catalyst 9.6 vs 9.5 vs 9.4 Performance Compared | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th June 2009 21:38 |
| ATI Catalyst 9.5 vs 9.4 Performance Test | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 22nd May 2009 08:07 |
| ATI Catalyst 9.2 Delivers Nice Performance Boost | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd February 2009 16:29 |
| ATI Catalyst 9.1 Driver: Performance Express-Test | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 30th January 2009 13:43 |
| ATI Catalyst 8.8 vs 8.7: OpenGL Performance Drop | jmke | WebNews | 11 | 26th August 2008 22:20 |
| Crossfire performance in Vista with Catalyst 8.7 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 24th July 2008 08:37 |
| ATI Catalyst 7.10 Drivers to Improve FPS Performance | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 10th October 2007 10:15 |
| DNA, OMEGA, Cat 4.6, Cat4.7 Beta - Performance Comparsion | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 20th June 2004 23:55 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
