It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Catalyst 3.8 Catalyst 3.8
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Catalyst 3.8
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th October 2003, 15:37   #11
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

@ MrC: don't care about the OC, better care about that monitor of yours, unless you want it to try do to the 9800Pro giving the wrong refresh rate config?
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 16:18   #12
uni1313
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At driverheaven they have tested different catalyst driver versions.

http://www.driverheaven.net/showthre...pagenu mber=1

ATI drivers put to the test: temperatures exposed:
There has been an awful lot of talk lately about the Cat 3.8 set raising the temperatures of ATI hardware, to get some truth to the matter one of our board members Neon Cowboy has spent alot of time testing various drivers using a probe on the back of his 9800 PCB with the 3.7 set, the 3.8 set and the Omega 3.8.5 set based on the dell drivers.

Final Results


Room Temperature 25.9C

Omegas based on 3.8.5
GPU
Idle 47.1
Full Load 55.6

Memory*
Idle 40.9
Full Load 52.1


Official Cat. 3.8ís
Idle 40.9
Full Load 46.3

Memory*
Idle 40.9
Full Load 52.1


Official Cat. 3.7ís
Idle 41.5
Full Load 47.6

Memory*
Idle 40.9
Full Load 52.1


Summary



The drivers based on the dell 3.8.5 leaked betas were the hottest. Closely followed by the cat 3.7ís and finally the cat 3.8ís were the coolest. The results were surprising to me to say the least.

Update

After some suggestions I went back through and checked the memory temps. This time also with the memory nudged up to 350 MHz* from stock to appease the over-clockers here. I was also surprised to get the exact same readings in each driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 16:22   #13
[M] Reviewer
 
The Senile Doctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
The Senile Doctor Freshly Registered
Default

I was right!
they're the coolest
__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world
The Senile Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2003, 16:30   #14
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

who cares...? it's not the MAIN issue here, if by using the 3.8 drivers you fry your monitor, than it won't matter how hot your GPU gets...
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2003, 16:17   #15
[M] Reviewer
 
Bosw8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
Bosw8er Freshly Registered
Default

http://www.guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=641
__________________
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
Bosw8er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2003, 16:41   #16
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Guru3D = copy of first link btw
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2003, 16:54   #17
[M] Reviewer
 
Bosw8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
Bosw8er Freshly Registered
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jmke
Guru3D = copy of first link btw
Can't find any excuse to justify why i did a repost ... but of course i can apologize by posting a pic
__________________
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
Bosw8er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th October 2003, 23:49   #18
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

ATI's statement:


Quote:
RESPONSE TO ALLEGED MONITOR FAILURE ISSUE

We have spent a great deal of time trying to reproduce this problem and analyzing our driver code. There is nothing in our driver code that has changed since CAT 3.7 to CAT 3.8 that could possibly cause this behaviour. We believe that our drivers are not causing these alleged problems.

We do not currently believe these stories are valid. We have already confirmed that of the nearly 100 OEM customer programs have asked for and received this driver, we have received no reports on any such problem from the OEMs. We have also run comprehensive QA tests on the driver before releasing it and have had no cases of failed monitors.

Since we announced CATALYST 3.8 on October 8th, we have recorded hundreds of thousands of downloads, and thus far there have been absolutely no reports whatsoever to ATI's Customer Support department to report monitors failing.


RESPONSE TO ALLEGED HARDWARE OVERHEATING ISSUE

We have spent a great deal of time analyzing the temperatures due to the CATALYST 3.8 drivers. We do not under any circumstance see anything near a 10 degree Celsius increase in temperature (but we don't overclock our test cards either). We do see a slight increase in temperature in certain cases (3Dmark2003 Nature Scene for example). However any temperature increase is well within our safety range. Investigation continues and we are trying to determine why this change in temperature exits. At this point we are reproducing individual driver packages with code being checked in and measuring the temperature. However nothing shows the alleged increase in temperature. One independent website even tried to reproduce this issue, and found no measurable difference in temperature between CATALYST 3.7 and 3.8.


TECHNICAL REBUTTAL OF MONITOR FAILURE ALLEGATIONS

There have been many posts in the forums discussing this issue, it seems it is a common theory, picked up from one place and keep being circulated. One such theory suggests the following:

"Instead of reading the refresh rates from the PRIMARY display INF files, it is reading the SECONDARY display INF refresh rates."

In XP and 2K, we don't have access to monitor INF information in our driver component that manages display capability. We have never used this monitor information for any purpose. We rely on EDID data or user override information to determine monitor capability. Even though the OS may use the monitor information to expose high refresh rate based on monitor INF content, the driver always restricts the actual refresh rate going to the monitor based on EDID or the user override. In essence, the user may be able to select from OS controlled monitor page (in advanced property pages) a high refresh rate but internally driver will restrict the refresh rate going to the monitor based on EDID information or user override information. If user set the override information incorrectly then incompatible signals would be sent to the monitor.

In 9x, we can access monitor INF information but due to issues with how OS maps the INF to a monitor, we had disabled reading the monitor INF via registry. Unless someone deliberately changes the registry setting for this in 9x, they would not run into any monitor INF related issues.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2003, 23:14   #19
Da_BoKa
 
Posts: n/a
Default

so normally the prob would be "solved" ( even never existed ) because i don't whant my brand new tft to fry??

BTW this is the first ati card i have, what are some good tune programms?

greetz
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Releases Catalyst 10.4a Preview jmke WebNews 0 22nd April 2010 15:02
ATI Catalyst 9.9 Drivers Released jmke WebNews 0 12th September 2009 15:18
ATI Catalyst 9.8 driver available for download jmke WebNews 0 15th August 2009 07:41
ATI Catalyst 9.6 vs 9.5 vs 9.4 Performance Compared jmke WebNews 0 11th June 2009 21:38
ATI Catalyst 5.7 Driver comparison jmke WebNews 0 19th July 2005 08:36
Catalyst Roundup 2005 jmke WebNews 1 18th May 2005 16:15
ATI Catalyst Tweak Guide *Updated* jmke WebNews 0 8th April 2005 16:09
Catalyst 5.3 Out jmke WebNews 0 10th March 2005 12:06
Catalyst 4.12 Driver Comparison jmke WebNews 0 14th December 2004 10:16
Catalyst 4.12 Out jmke WebNews 0 14th December 2004 10:03

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:58.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO